AppD documentation improvements from AtharvaKathe18#1799
Open
AppD documentation improvements from AtharvaKathe18#1799
Conversation
docs: correct 'Bearer authentication schema' to 'scheme' in App Directory API docs
…in-bullet docs: add missing period for consistency in App Directory compliance list
docs: improve conceptual clarity in App Directory overview
✅ Deploy Preview for fdc3 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
|
|
Contributor
Author
|
@novavi & @hughtroeger one for you to take a quick look at, its short. Feel free to directly apply any changes. |
27 tasks
Roaders
approved these changes
Mar 19, 2026
Contributor
|
LGTM |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe your change
This PR combines the small appD documentation improvements contributed by @AtharvaKathe18, in a new PR that should pass the checks and be mergeable (where the original PRs weren't due to the issue with the coverage workflow that has been fixed since this was raised).
Related Issue
none
Contributor License Agreement
CLA requirements were met on the original PRs
Review Checklist
I think the changes are small enough that they donn't warrant a changelog entry