Remove copyright licences from job execution and form rebranding files

[RachelColman]

This PR is to remove Camunda copyright statements on files that we had previously added unnecessarily to which do not need to be there.
These features do not contain any code copied over from the Camunda 7 CE version. The files do contain code from the bpmn.io repo (https://github.com/bpmn-io/bpmn-js-properties-panel) so we only need to ensure the LICENCE file references MIT.

[bryankenneally]

@gliptak @pieter-schutte @finos/fluxnova-maintainers Would you mind reviewing when you have a chance please? Thanks

[HarishMalavade]

We should not be removing any existing copyrights from camunda

[pieter-schutte]

Agreed. Very risky, and not sure what benefit we will get

[bryankenneally]

Prajwol and I chatted about this today and think we can go ahead with removing the copyright statements because the files we copied from the bpm.io repo did not originate with Camunda, and should not be attributed by us to them. Our intention is to only remove copyright statements that were added by us in error. We won't be removing/changing statements on code that originated with Camunda.

Here's a detailed example to give better context:

• JobExecutionProps.js file originally copied from bpmn-io repo (no copyright): https://github.com/bpmn-io/bpmn-js-properties-panel/blob/main/src/provider/camunda-platform/properties/JobExecutionProps.js
• PR where JobExecutionProps.js was copied over to Fluxnova Modeler repo (with a new copyright statement): https://github.com/finos/fluxnova-modeler/pull/37/changes#diff-0537b7c7489789075900758ec21310630d2632efcfffe1af9934850a34676befR3-R7
• Pieter asked why the copyright was added: Add retry time cycle group to element templates #37 (comment)
• New PR opened to remove copyright statement from JobExectionProps.js: https://github.com/finos/fluxnova-modeler/pull/53/changes#diff-0537b7c7489789075900758ec21310630d2632efcfffe1af9934850a34676bef

[HarishMalavade]

We should retain existing copyrights as is

[RachelColman]

We should retain existing copyrights as is

@HarishMalavade I will close off this PR as the only changes were to remove those copyright licences

[pieter-schutte]

This PR is to remove Camunda copyright statements on files that we had previously added unnecessarily to which do not need to be there. These features do not contain any code copied over from the Camunda 7 CE version. The files do contain code from the bpmn.io repo (https://github.com/bpmn-io/bpmn-js-properties-panel) so we only need to ensure the LICENCE file references MIT.

Do we know how the statements got implemented in the 1st place?

[bryankenneally]

This PR is to remove Camunda copyright statements on files that we had previously added unnecessarily to which do not need to be there. These features do not contain any code copied over from the Camunda 7 CE version. The files do contain code from the bpmn.io repo (https://github.com/bpmn-io/bpmn-js-properties-panel) so we only need to ensure the LICENCE file references MIT.

Do we know how the statements got implemented in the 1st place?

I've added some context here, Pieter: #53 (comment)

[prajwolbhandari1]

Thanks for making this change @RachelColman @bryankenneally

LGTM