feat: Add support for executing pre-receive hooks

[fabiovincenzi]

This PR adds support for managing pre-receive hooks by executing .sh scripts located in the ./hooks directory. These scripts allow administrators to define conditions for automatically approving or rejecting pushes.

Changes Introduced

• Implement execution of .sh scripts in the ./hooks directory to validate pushes.
• Add basic tests to verify hook execution functionality.

You can also test this feature using the following pre-receive samples. Simply place a sample script in the ./hooks directory and attempt a push. The script should execute and determine whether the push is accepted or rejected.

[linux-foundation-easycla]

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ login: fabiovincenzi (1233039, 8627635, 939bca4, ec51f00, eb78943, d2dc9a9, 1422dc5, 435cb63, 81c40b3, 5adb1e4, 1e21b09, b6953fe, 54970fb, 46306d1, f87763f, 48f49e0, 0808aab)
• ✅ login: JamieSlome / name: Jamie Slome (c9d463f, 774a55e)

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for endearing-brigadeiros-63f9d0 canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	774a55e
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/endearing-brigadeiros-63f9d0/deploys/67d2f8f3824b7700081842e9

[JamieSlome]

@06kellyjac (cc) 🍰

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 61.88%. Comparing base (d043db7) to head (774a55e).
Report is 20 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #908      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   61.06%   61.88%   +0.81%     
==========================================
  Files          48       49       +1     
  Lines        1767     1805      +38     
==========================================
+ Hits         1079     1117      +38     
  Misses        688      688              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[JamieSlome]

Another solid G-PR 😏

Can you confirm my understanding? This PR supports the definition and execution of .sh scripts which can be exposed to the chain via the hooks folder?

[JamieSlome]

Just a reminder to get the EasyCLA signed and we're good to proceed 🍰

[fabiovincenzi]

Another solid G-PR 😏

Can you confirm my understanding? This PR supports the definition and execution of .sh scripts which can be exposed to the chain via the hooks folder?

Thank you @JamieSlome for the review!
Exactly that is the flow🙌🏻

[JamieSlome]

Thanks for the clarifications and updates ❤️ Once the EasyCLA is signed I'll merge the PR 🍰

EDIT: and release 🚀

[fabiovincenzi]

@JamieSlome I added a check to verify whether the pre-receive hook exists. If it doesn’t, we simply skip its execution without any errors. This way, the check is only enforced if both the hooks folder and the pre-receive file are present. What do you think?

Aside from that, we were considering implementing auto-approval of pushes using this hook. I'll create a separate PR for that, but perhaps adding a configuration option like enable-auto-approval: true could allow pushes to be automatically approved and pushed to the upstream, or maybe define something like:

• status = 0 -> auto-approve.
• status = 1 -> auto-reject.
• status = 2 -> manual-approving.

We are working to get the EasyCLA signed, thanks again!😊

[fabiovincenzi]

@JamieSlome, All set! EasyCLA is now signed.

[JamieSlome]

LGTM! 🍰