feat(ai): Add thinking levels parameter #9424
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 101059f The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 2 packages
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
Summary of ChangesHello @hsubox76, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the AI model configuration by introducing a Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
Changeset File Check ✅
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces the thinkingLevel parameter to the thinkingConfig, providing users with presets to control the model's thinking process. The changes include updates to the ThinkingConfig interface, new type definitions for ThinkingLevel, and comprehensive documentation updates. A key addition is the client-side validation that prevents thinkingLevel and thinkingBudget from being set simultaneously, which is a great way to prevent invalid configurations. The associated test case for this validation is also well-implemented. Overall, the changes are solid. I have one minor suggestion to improve the readability of the validation logic.
Size Report 1Affected Products
Test Logs |
Size Analysis Report 1This report is too large (1,080,564 characters) to be displayed here in a GitHub comment. Please use the below link to see the full report on Google Cloud Storage.Test Logs |
docs-devsite/ai.thinkingconfig.md
Outdated
| If you don't specify a budget, the model will determine the appropriate amount of thinking based on the complexity of the prompt. | ||
| The range of supported thinking budget values depends on the model. | ||
|
|
||
| <ul> <li>To use the default thinking budget or thinking level for a model, leave this value undefined.</li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It looks like this is describing thinkingBudget? If so, I'm not sure if we should be talking about thinking levels in this section?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Removed thinking levels from this sentence but kept the line below that says you cannot set both.
docs-devsite/ai.thinkingconfig.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| <li>To disable thinking, when supported by the model, set this value to `0`<!-- -->.</li> | ||
|
|
||
| <li>To use dynamic thinking, allowing the model to decide on the thinking budget based on the task, set this value to `-1`<!-- -->.</li> </ul> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| <li>To use dynamic thinking, allowing the model to decide on the thinking budget based on the task, set this value to `-1`<!-- -->.</li> </ul> | |
| <li>To use dynamic thinking, which allows the model to decide on the thinking budget based on the task, set this value to `-1`<!-- -->.</li> </ul> |
4 participants
Add thinking levels feature.
API proposal (internal): https://docs.google.com/document/d/16cdWurhdLDuNIDj0eJWNnL00any0tL_DjI-lAg7miP8/edit?tab=t.0
Added the param, plus an error if both thinkingLevel and thinkingBudget are set. This validation function may be used in the future to validate other common config issues.
Docs notes: