-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Correct handling of __name__ in firestore indexes #8862
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 5 commits
f127fba
5290d41
fce1b90
7a21aaa
bd6fadc
42fdcff
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
- Fixed issue where `__name__` fields with DESCENDING order were incorrectly filtered from index listings, causing duplicate index issues (#7629) and deployment conflicts (#8859). The fix now preserves `__name__` fields with explicit DESCENDING order while filtering out implicit ASCENDING `__name__` fields. |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -18,9 +18,34 @@ | |
apiClient = new Client({ urlPrefix: firestoreOrigin(), apiVersion: "v1" }); | ||
printer = new PrettyPrint(); | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Process indexes by filtering out implicit __name__ fields with ASCENDING order. | ||
* Keeps explicit __name__ fields with DESCENDING order. | ||
* @param indexes Array of indexes to process | ||
* @returns Processed array of indexes with filtered fields | ||
*/ | ||
public static processIndexes(indexes: types.Index[]): types.Index[] { | ||
return indexes.map((index: types.Index): types.Index => { | ||
// Per https://firebase.google.com/docs/firestore/query-data/index-overview#default_ordering_and_the_name_field | ||
// this matches the direction of the last non-name field in the index. | ||
let fields = index.fields; | ||
const lastField = index.fields[index.fields.length - 1]; | ||
if (lastField.fieldPath === "__name__") { | ||
const defaultDirection = index.fields[index.fields.length - 2]?.order; | ||
if (lastField.order === defaultDirection) { | ||
fields = fields.slice(0, -1); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
return { | ||
...index, | ||
fields, | ||
}; | ||
}); | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Deploy an index specification to the specified project. | ||
* @param options the CLI options. | ||
Check warning on line 48 in src/firestore/api.ts
|
||
* @param indexes an array of objects, each will be validated and then converted | ||
* to an {@link Spec.Index}. | ||
* @param fieldOverrides an array of objects, each will be validated and then | ||
|
@@ -28,11 +53,11 @@ | |
*/ | ||
async deploy( | ||
options: { project: string; nonInteractive: boolean; force: boolean }, | ||
indexes: any[], | ||
fieldOverrides: any[], | ||
databaseId = "(default)", | ||
): Promise<void> { | ||
const spec = this.upgradeOldSpec({ | ||
indexes, | ||
fieldOverrides, | ||
}); | ||
|
@@ -40,8 +65,8 @@ | |
this.validateSpec(spec); | ||
|
||
// Now that the spec is validated we can safely assert these types. | ||
const indexesToDeploy: Spec.Index[] = spec.indexes; | ||
Check warning on line 68 in src/firestore/api.ts
|
||
const fieldOverridesToDeploy: Spec.FieldOverride[] = spec.fieldOverrides; | ||
|
||
const existingIndexes: types.Index[] = await this.listIndexes(options.project, databaseId); | ||
const existingFieldOverrides: types.Field[] = await this.listFieldOverrides( | ||
|
@@ -183,7 +208,7 @@ | |
return []; | ||
} | ||
|
||
return indexes; | ||
return FirestoreApi.processIndexes(indexes); | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -447,6 +447,146 @@ describe("IndexSpecMatching", () => { | |
}); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
describe("IndexListingWithNameFields", () => { | ||
it("should filter out __name__ fields with in the default order, when the default is ASCENDING", () => { | ||
const mockIndexes: API.Index[] = [ | ||
{ | ||
name: "/projects/myproject/databases/(default)/collectionGroups/collection/indexes/abc123", | ||
queryScope: API.QueryScope.COLLECTION, | ||
fields: [ | ||
{ fieldPath: "foo", order: API.Order.ASCENDING }, | ||
{ fieldPath: "__name__", order: API.Order.ASCENDING }, | ||
], | ||
state: API.State.READY, | ||
}, | ||
]; | ||
|
||
const result = FirestoreApi.processIndexes(mockIndexes); | ||
|
||
expect(result[0].fields).to.have.length(1); | ||
expect(result[0].fields[0].fieldPath).to.equal("foo"); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
it("should filter out __name__ fields with in the default order, when the default is DESCENDING", () => { | ||
const mockIndexes: API.Index[] = [ | ||
{ | ||
name: "/projects/myproject/databases/(default)/collectionGroups/collection/indexes/abc123", | ||
queryScope: API.QueryScope.COLLECTION, | ||
fields: [ | ||
{ fieldPath: "foo", order: API.Order.DESCENDING }, | ||
{ fieldPath: "__name__", order: API.Order.DESCENDING }, | ||
], | ||
state: API.State.READY, | ||
}, | ||
]; | ||
|
||
const result = FirestoreApi.processIndexes(mockIndexes); | ||
|
||
expect(result[0].fields).to.have.length(1); | ||
expect(result[0].fields[0].fieldPath).to.equal("foo"); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
it("should keep __name__ fields with DESCENDING order, when the default is ASCENDING", () => { | ||
const mockIndexes: API.Index[] = [ | ||
{ | ||
name: "/projects/myproject/databases/(default)/collectionGroups/collection/indexes/abc123", | ||
queryScope: API.QueryScope.COLLECTION, | ||
fields: [ | ||
{ fieldPath: "foo", order: API.Order.ASCENDING }, | ||
{ fieldPath: "__name__", order: API.Order.DESCENDING }, | ||
], | ||
state: API.State.READY, | ||
}, | ||
]; | ||
|
||
const result = FirestoreApi.processIndexes(mockIndexes); | ||
|
||
expect(result[0].fields).to.have.length(2); | ||
expect(result[0].fields[0].fieldPath).to.equal("foo"); | ||
expect(result[0].fields[1].fieldPath).to.equal("__name__"); | ||
expect(result[0].fields[1].order).to.equal(API.Order.DESCENDING); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
it("should keep __name__ fields with ASCENDING order, when the default is DESCENDING", () => { | ||
const mockIndexes: API.Index[] = [ | ||
{ | ||
name: "/projects/myproject/databases/(default)/collectionGroups/collection/indexes/abc123", | ||
queryScope: API.QueryScope.COLLECTION, | ||
fields: [ | ||
{ fieldPath: "foo", order: API.Order.DESCENDING }, | ||
{ fieldPath: "__name__", order: API.Order.ASCENDING }, | ||
], | ||
state: API.State.READY, | ||
}, | ||
]; | ||
|
||
const result = FirestoreApi.processIndexes(mockIndexes); | ||
|
||
expect(result[0].fields).to.have.length(2); | ||
expect(result[0].fields[0].fieldPath).to.equal("foo"); | ||
expect(result[0].fields[1].fieldPath).to.equal("__name__"); | ||
expect(result[0].fields[1].order).to.equal(API.Order.ASCENDING); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
it("should distinguish between indexes that differ only by __name__ order", () => { | ||
const mockIndexes: API.Index[] = [ | ||
{ | ||
name: "/projects/myproject/databases/(default)/collectionGroups/collection/indexes/abc123", | ||
queryScope: API.QueryScope.COLLECTION, | ||
fields: [ | ||
{ fieldPath: "foo", order: API.Order.ASCENDING }, | ||
{ fieldPath: "__name__", order: API.Order.ASCENDING }, | ||
], | ||
state: API.State.READY, | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
name: "/projects/myproject/databases/(default)/collectionGroups/collection/indexes/def456", | ||
queryScope: API.QueryScope.COLLECTION, | ||
fields: [ | ||
{ fieldPath: "foo", order: API.Order.ASCENDING }, | ||
{ fieldPath: "__name__", order: API.Order.DESCENDING }, | ||
], | ||
state: API.State.READY, | ||
}, | ||
]; | ||
|
||
const result = FirestoreApi.processIndexes(mockIndexes); | ||
|
||
// First index should have __name__ field filtered out | ||
expect(result[0].fields).to.have.length(1); | ||
expect(result[0].fields[0].fieldPath).to.equal("foo"); | ||
|
||
// Second index should keep __name__ field with DESCENDING order | ||
expect(result[1].fields).to.have.length(2); | ||
expect(result[1].fields[0].fieldPath).to.equal("foo"); | ||
expect(result[1].fields[1].fieldPath).to.equal("__name__"); | ||
expect(result[1].fields[1].order).to.equal(API.Order.DESCENDING); | ||
|
||
// The two processed indexes should be different (fixing the duplicate issue) | ||
expect(JSON.stringify(result[0].fields)).to.not.equal(JSON.stringify(result[1].fields)); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
it("should handle indexes with no __name__ fields", () => { | ||
const mockIndexes: API.Index[] = [ | ||
{ | ||
name: "/projects/myproject/databases/(default)/collectionGroups/collection/indexes/abc123", | ||
queryScope: API.QueryScope.COLLECTION, | ||
fields: [ | ||
{ fieldPath: "foo", order: API.Order.ASCENDING }, | ||
{ fieldPath: "bar", arrayConfig: API.ArrayConfig.CONTAINS }, | ||
], | ||
state: API.State.READY, | ||
}, | ||
]; | ||
|
||
const result = FirestoreApi.processIndexes(mockIndexes); | ||
|
||
expect(result[0].fields).to.have.length(2); | ||
expect(result[0].fields[0].fieldPath).to.equal("foo"); | ||
expect(result[0].fields[1].fieldPath).to.equal("bar"); | ||
}); | ||
}); | ||
Comment on lines
+450
to
+588
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The new tests cover composite indexes well, but they miss an important edge case: an index that only contains the it("should filter out a single __name__ ASCENDING field", () => {
const mockIndexes: API.Index[] = [
{
name: "/projects/myproject/databases/(default)/collectionGroups/collection/indexes/abc123",
queryScope: API.QueryScope.COLLECTION,
fields: [
{ fieldPath: "__name__", order: API.Order.ASCENDING },
],
state: API.State.READY,
},
];
const result = FirestoreApi.processIndexes(mockIndexes);
expect(result[0].fields).to.have.length(0);
});
it("should keep a single __name__ DESCENDING field", () => {
const mockIndexes: API.Index[] = [
{
name: "/projects/myproject/databases/(default)/collectionGroups/collection/indexes/abc123",
queryScope: API.QueryScope.COLLECTION,
fields: [
{ fieldPath: "__name__", order: API.Order.DESCENDING },
],
state: API.State.READY,
},
];
const result = FirestoreApi.processIndexes(mockIndexes);
expect(result[0].fields).to.have.length(1);
expect(result[0].fields[0].fieldPath).to.equal("__name__");
expect(result[0].fields[0].order).to.equal(API.Order.DESCENDING);
}); |
||
|
||
describe("IndexSorting", () => { | ||
it("should be able to handle empty arrays", () => { | ||
expect(([] as Spec.Index[]).sort(sort.compareSpecIndex)).to.eql([]); | ||
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.