Modifies updateService related to functions deployment

[brittanycho]

Modifies updateService related to functions deployment

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @brittanycho, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the updateService functionality related to functions deployment by switching the underlying API call from POST to PATCH, which is more appropriate for partial updates. Additionally, it enhances the trigger type detection logic to ensure that services without an explicit trigger annotation default to an HTTPS trigger, improving robustness and compatibility for function deployments.

Highlights

• API Call Method Change: The updateService function in src/gcp/runv2.ts was updated to use an HTTP PATCH request instead of a POST request for updating services. This aligns with standard RESTful practices for partial updates.
• Function Trigger Type Logic: The logic for determining the trigger type (HTTPS vs. Event) for deployed functions was modified. It now defaults to an HTTPS trigger if the TRIGGER_TYPE_ANNOTATION is not present on the service, ensuring broader compatibility.
• Test Case Alignment: A test case in src/gcp/runv2.spec.ts was adjusted to reflect the change in trigger type handling, specifically using httpsTrigger in the test service definition.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog

• src/gcp/runv2.spec.ts
  • Updated a test service definition to use httpsTrigger instead of eventTrigger.
• src/gcp/runv2.ts
  • Changed the updateService function to use client.patch instead of client.post for service updates.
  • Modified the endpointFromService function to default to httpsTrigger if TRIGGER_TYPE_ANNOTATION is not set or is HTTP_TRIGGER.

Activity

• No human activity has been recorded on this pull request yet.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request correctly changes the updateService function to use the PATCH method, which is more semantically appropriate for updates. It also includes a bug fix in endpointFromService to correctly default to an httpsTrigger when trigger annotations are missing. The changes are logical and improve correctness. I have one minor suggestion to enhance code readability.

[gemini-code-assist]

This condition is a bit repetitive. To improve readability and maintainability, consider extracting service.annotations?.[TRIGGER_TYPE_ANNOTATION] into a variable before this object literal.

For example:

const triggerType = service.annotations?.[TRIGGER_TYPE_ANNOTATION];
// ...
...(!triggerType || triggerType === "HTTP_TRIGGER"
  ? { httpsTrigger: {} }
  : { /* ... */ })