Skip to content

Conversation

roypat
Copy link
Contributor

@roypat roypat commented Sep 6, 2024

Kani has no use for pre-built binaries, and I'm fairly certain it cannot
even reuse the build artifacts due to using a different toolchain. So
pass --no-build to devtool test when running the kani test to safe a
few more minutes there.

License Acceptance

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the Apache 2.0 license. For more information on following Developer
Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check
CONTRIBUTING.md.

PR Checklist

  • If a specific issue led to this PR, this PR closes the issue.
  • The description of changes is clear and encompassing.
  • Any required documentation changes (code and docs) are included in this
    PR.
  • API changes follow the Runbook for Firecracker API changes.
  • User-facing changes are mentioned in CHANGELOG.md.
  • All added/changed functionality is tested.
  • New TODOs link to an issue.
  • Commits meet
    contribution quality standards.

  • This functionality cannot be added in rust-vmm.

Kani has no use for pre-built binaries, and I'm fairly certain it cannot
even reuse the build artifacts due to using a different toolchain. So
pass `--no-build` to `devtool test` when running the kani test to safe a
few more minutes there.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Roy <[email protected]>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.32%. Comparing base (599c48c) to head (214c8a8).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Current head 214c8a8 differs from pull request most recent head eb33072

Please upload reports for the commit eb33072 to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4786      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.34%   84.32%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         249      249              
  Lines       27460    27457       -3     
==========================================
- Hits        23160    23154       -6     
- Misses       4300     4303       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
5.10-c5n.metal ?
5.10-m5n.metal 84.56% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m6a.metal 83.84% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m6g.metal ?
5.10-m6i.metal 84.55% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m7g.metal 80.92% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-c5n.metal ?
6.1-m5n.metal ?
6.1-m6a.metal 83.85% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m6g.metal 80.91% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m6i.metal 84.55% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m7g.metal 80.91% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@roypat
Copy link
Contributor Author

roypat commented Sep 6, 2024

See https://buildkite.com/firecracker/firecracker-pr/builds/11026#0191c77e-61a3-4285-81ee-7bc9381cc53a as an example of it no longer building firecracker (again, I had to use a dummy commit to get the kani test to trigger)

@roypat roypat added the Status: Awaiting review Indicates that a pull request is ready to be reviewed label Sep 6, 2024
@roypat roypat merged commit e4c0b9b into firecracker-microvm:main Sep 6, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Status: Awaiting review Indicates that a pull request is ready to be reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants