Skip to content

Conversation

@zulinx86
Copy link
Contributor

@zulinx86 zulinx86 commented Apr 10, 2025

Changes & Reason

To support the snapshot feature for Intel AMX, we changed to use Xsave struct instead of kvm_xsave struct. We should have bumped the snapshot version.

Fixes: 803140d ("feat(vmm): Use structs and methods for KVM_CAP_XSAVE2")

License Acceptance

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the Apache 2.0 license. For more information on following Developer
Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check
CONTRIBUTING.md.

PR Checklist

  • I have read and understand CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • I have run tools/devtool checkstyle to verify that the PR passes the
    automated style checks.
  • I have described what is done in these changes, why they are needed, and
    how they are solving the problem in a clear and encompassing way.
  • [ ] I have updated any relevant documentation (both in code and in the docs)
    in the PR.
  • I have mentioned all user-facing changes in CHANGELOG.md.
  • [ ] If a specific issue led to this PR, this PR closes the issue.
  • When making API changes, I have followed the
    Runbook for Firecracker API changes.
  • I have tested all new and changed functionalities in unit tests and/or
    integration tests.
  • [ ] I have linked an issue to every new TODO.

  • This functionality cannot be added in rust-vmm.

To support the snapshot feature for Intel AMX, we changed to use
`Xsave` struct instead of `kvm_xsave` struct. We should have bumped the
snapshot version.

Fixes: 803140d ("feat(vmm): Use structs and methods for KVM_CAP_XSAVE2")
Signed-off-by: Takahiro Itazuri <[email protected]>
@zulinx86 zulinx86 added the Status: Awaiting author Indicates that an issue or pull request requires author action label Apr 10, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.10%. Comparing base (e1076e7) to head (4f08ed9).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5149      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.04%   83.10%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         250      250              
  Lines       26900    26900              
==========================================
+ Hits        22340    22354      +14     
+ Misses       4560     4546      -14     
Flag Coverage Δ
5.10-c5n.metal 83.59% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m5n.metal 83.59% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m6a.metal 82.82% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m6g.metal 79.38% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m6i.metal 83.58% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m7a.metal-48xl 82.80% <ø> (?)
5.10-m7g.metal 79.38% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m7i.metal-24xl 83.54% <ø> (?)
5.10-m7i.metal-48xl 83.54% <ø> (?)
6.1-c5n.metal 83.64% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m5n.metal 83.64% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m6a.metal 82.86% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m6g.metal 79.37% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
6.1-m6i.metal 83.62% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
6.1-m7a.metal-48xl 82.85% <ø> (?)
6.1-m7g.metal 79.38% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m7i.metal-24xl 83.64% <ø> (?)
6.1-m7i.metal-48xl 83.64% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@zulinx86 zulinx86 enabled auto-merge (rebase) April 10, 2025 08:54
@zulinx86 zulinx86 merged commit 6338be2 into firecracker-microvm:main Apr 10, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
@zulinx86 zulinx86 deleted the bump_snapshot_version branch April 10, 2025 09:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Status: Awaiting author Indicates that an issue or pull request requires author action

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants