Skip to content

Conversation

bchalios
Copy link
Contributor

@bchalios bchalios commented Jul 30, 2025

Changes

Ignore writes for setting MSI-X vector for invalid queues

Reason

Otherwise, we'll get panics when accessing of msix_queue vector.

License Acceptance

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the Apache 2.0 license. For more information on following Developer
Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check
CONTRIBUTING.md.

PR Checklist

  • I have read and understand CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • I have run tools/devtool checkbuild --all to verify that the PR passes
    build checks on all supported architectures.
  • I have run tools/devtool checkstyle to verify that the PR passes the
    automated style checks.
  • I have described what is done in these changes, why they are needed, and
    how they are solving the problem in a clear and encompassing way.
  • I have updated any relevant documentation (both in code and in the docs)
    in the PR.
  • I have mentioned all user-facing changes in CHANGELOG.md.
  • If a specific issue led to this PR, this PR closes the issue.
  • When making API changes, I have followed the
    Runbook for Firecracker API changes.
  • I have tested all new and changed functionalities in unit tests and/or
    integration tests.
  • I have linked an issue to every new TODO.

  • This functionality cannot be added in rust-vmm.

This is the equivalent to the fix in 741c29f but for guest writes.
We need to make sure that `queue_select` points to a valid queue before
setting the MSI-X vector otherwise we'll hit a panic when accessing the
underlying `Vec`.

Signed-off-by: Babis Chalios <[email protected]>
@bchalios bchalios added the Status: Awaiting review Indicates that a pull request is ready to be reviewed label Jul 30, 2025
@bchalios bchalios changed the base branch from main to feature/pcie July 30, 2025 08:37
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 80.36%. Comparing base (5421d0c) to head (d16c5d0).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on feature/pcie.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##           feature/pcie    #5335   +/-   ##
=============================================
  Coverage         80.35%   80.36%           
=============================================
  Files               265      265           
  Lines             30821    30828    +7     
=============================================
+ Hits              24767    24775    +8     
+ Misses             6054     6053    -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
5.10-c5n.metal 80.12% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m5n.metal 80.12% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m6a.metal 79.32% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m6g.metal 76.64% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m6i.metal 80.11% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
5.10-m7a.metal-48xl 79.32% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
5.10-m7g.metal 76.64% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m7i.metal-24xl 80.08% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m7i.metal-48xl 80.09% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m8g.metal-24xl 76.64% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m8g.metal-48xl 76.64% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-c5n.metal 80.16% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m5n.metal 80.16% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m6a.metal 79.36% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m6g.metal 76.64% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m6i.metal 80.16% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m7a.metal-48xl 79.36% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m7g.metal 76.64% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m7i.metal-24xl 80.17% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m7i.metal-48xl 80.17% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m8g.metal-24xl 76.64% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m8g.metal-48xl 76.64% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@roypat roypat merged commit 411ecd1 into firecracker-microvm:feature/pcie Jul 30, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
@bchalios bchalios deleted the fix_msix branch July 30, 2025 09:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Status: Awaiting review Indicates that a pull request is ready to be reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants