Skip to content

Conversation

Manciukic
Copy link
Contributor

@Manciukic Manciukic commented Sep 2, 2025

Changes

Adds a definition for release QA pipeline to also define it as code in our repository.

This also adds a test mode when VERSION=dev where "make_release" is used to generate the artifacts instead of downloading them from S3.

Reason

The release QA pipeline broke and we fixed it manually. As it wasn't defined in code, it's hard to track and audit changes to it, so we should move it to our repo.

At the same time, we were wondering if we could test this pipeline weekly. This change addresses that by enabling a new mode when "VERSION=dev" that uses devtool make_release to build the release artifacts from main and use them instead of downloading a specific release.
By running the pipeline weekly on main with that option we can be notified when make_release or the QA pipeline fail.

License Acceptance

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the Apache 2.0 license. For more information on following Developer
Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check
CONTRIBUTING.md.

PR Checklist

  • I have read and understand CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • I have run tools/devtool checkbuild --all to verify that the PR passes
    build checks on all supported architectures.
  • I have run tools/devtool checkstyle to verify that the PR passes the
    automated style checks.
  • I have described what is done in these changes, why they are needed, and
    how they are solving the problem in a clear and encompassing way.
  • I have updated any relevant documentation (both in code and in the docs)
    in the PR.
  • I have mentioned all user-facing changes in CHANGELOG.md.
  • If a specific issue led to this PR, this PR closes the issue.
  • When making API changes, I have followed the
    Runbook for Firecracker API changes.
  • I have tested all new and changed functionalities in unit tests and/or
    integration tests.
  • I have linked an issue to every new TODO.

  • This functionality cannot be added in rust-vmm.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 2, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.73%. Comparing base (5dde18c) to head (ca5a0f0).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5425   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.73%   82.73%           
=======================================
  Files         263      263           
  Lines       27455    27455           
=======================================
  Hits        22715    22715           
  Misses       4740     4740           
Flag Coverage Δ
5.10-m5n.metal 82.84% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m6a.metal 82.09% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m6g.metal 79.52% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m6i.metal 82.83% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m7a.metal-48xl 82.08% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m7g.metal 79.52% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m7i.metal-24xl 82.81% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m7i.metal-48xl 82.81% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m8g.metal-24xl 79.52% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m8g.metal-48xl 79.52% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m5n.metal 82.87% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m6a.metal 82.13% <ø> (?)
6.1-m6g.metal 79.52% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m6i.metal 82.87% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m7a.metal-48xl 82.12% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m7g.metal 79.52% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m7i.metal-24xl 82.88% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m7i.metal-48xl 82.88% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m8g.metal-24xl 79.52% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m8g.metal-48xl 79.52% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Manciukic
Copy link
Contributor Author

Manciukic commented Sep 2, 2025

Release QA pipeline testing in my personal pipeline:

Adds a definition for release QA pipeline to also define it as code in
our repository.

This also adds a test mode when VERSION=dev where "make_release" is used
to generate the artifacts instead of downloading them from S3.

Signed-off-by: Riccardo Mancini <[email protected]>
@Manciukic Manciukic marked this pull request as ready for review September 2, 2025 11:11
@Manciukic Manciukic added the Status: Awaiting review Indicates that a pull request is ready to be reviewed label Sep 2, 2025
@zulinx86 zulinx86 self-requested a review September 3, 2025 08:51
@ShadowCurse ShadowCurse merged commit 286aa17 into firecracker-microvm:main Sep 3, 2025
7 checks passed
@Manciukic Manciukic deleted the bk-release-qa branch September 3, 2025 09:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Status: Awaiting review Indicates that a pull request is ready to be reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants