test(perf/vsock): copy iperf binary only once #5430
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes
Move the copy into the test construction to copy the binary only once.
Reason
Currently we copy the iperf3-vsock binary into the guest in spawn_iperf3_client that is called by every client (we have 2). If by the time the second binary is being copied that first one is already executing, we get the "Text file busy" error.
License Acceptance
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the Apache 2.0 license. For more information on following Developer
Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check
CONTRIBUTING.md
.PR Checklist
[ ] I have runtools/devtool checkbuild --all
to verify that the PR passesbuild checks on all supported architectures.
tools/devtool checkstyle
to verify that the PR passes theautomated style checks.
how they are solving the problem in a clear and encompassing way.
[ ] I have updated any relevant documentation (both in code and in the docs)in the PR.
[ ] I have mentioned all user-facing changes inCHANGELOG.md
.[ ] If a specific issue led to this PR, this PR closes the issue.[ ] When making API changes, I have followed theRunbook for Firecracker API changes.
[ ] I have tested all new and changed functionalities in unit tests and/orintegration tests.
[ ] I have linked an issue to every newTODO
.rust-vmm
.