test(uffd): MAP_POPULATE backing file #5445
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes
Mmap the backing file in the UFFD handlers with
MAP_POPULATE
.Reason
We use example UFFD handlers in performance tests to measure the population latency. We do not want for it to be diluted by the page faults in the backing file. Using an already populated backing file makes the measurement more precise.
License Acceptance
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the Apache 2.0 license. For more information on following Developer
Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check
CONTRIBUTING.md
.PR Checklist
[ ] I have runtools/devtool checkbuild --all
to verify that the PR passesbuild checks on all supported architectures.
tools/devtool checkstyle
to verify that the PR passes theautomated style checks.
[ ] I have described what is done in these changes, why they are needed, andhow they are solving the problem in a clear and encompassing way.
[ ] I have updated any relevant documentation (both in code and in the docs)in the PR.
[ ] I have mentioned all user-facing changes inCHANGELOG.md
.[ ] If a specific issue led to this PR, this PR closes the issue.[ ] When making API changes, I have followed theRunbook for Firecracker API changes.
[ ] I have tested all new and changed functionalities in unit tests and/orintegration tests.
[ ] I have linked an issue to every newTODO
.rust-vmm
.