[1.14] test(cargo audit): temporarily ignore bincode advisory

[kalyazin]

Cherry pick from #5613 .

Changes

...

Reason

...

License Acceptance

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the Apache 2.0 license. For more information on following Developer
Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check
CONTRIBUTING.md.

PR Checklist

• I have read and understand CONTRIBUTING.md.
• I have run tools/devtool checkbuild --all to verify that the PR passes
  build checks on all supported architectures.
• I have run tools/devtool checkstyle to verify that the PR passes the
  automated style checks.
• I have described what is done in these changes, why they are needed, and
  how they are solving the problem in a clear and encompassing way.
• I have updated any relevant documentation (both in code and in the docs)
  in the PR.
• I have mentioned all user-facing changes in CHANGELOG.md.
• If a specific issue led to this PR, this PR closes the issue.
• When making API changes, I have followed the
  Runbook for Firecracker API changes.
• I have tested all new and changed functionalities in unit tests and/or
  integration tests.
• I have linked an issue to every new TODO.

---

• This functionality cannot be added in rust-vmm.

[Manciukic]

nit: on the 1.14 branch the exclusion will probably be permanent, rather than temporary (I don't think we'll backport the replacement unless there are actual CVEs on bincode)
(I'm fine leaving the commit as is, just noting it down)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 83.36%. Comparing base (7137308) to head (20d8738).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on firecracker-v1.14.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           firecracker-v1.14    #5616   +/-   ##
==================================================
  Coverage              83.36%   83.36%           
==================================================
  Files                    277      277           
  Lines                  29252    29252           
==================================================
  Hits                   24387    24387           
  Misses                  4865     4865           

Flag	Coverage Δ
5.10-m5n.metal	83.60% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m6a.metal	82.92% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
5.10-m6g.metal	80.33% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m6i.metal	83.59% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
5.10-m7a.metal-48xl	82.92% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
5.10-m7g.metal	80.33% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m7i.metal-24xl	83.57% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m7i.metal-48xl	83.56% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
5.10-m8g.metal-24xl	80.33% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
5.10-m8g.metal-48xl	80.33% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m5n.metal	83.62% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m6a.metal	82.96% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m6g.metal	80.33% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
6.1-m6i.metal	83.62% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
6.1-m7a.metal-48xl	82.94% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m7g.metal	80.33% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m7i.metal-24xl	83.63% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
6.1-m7i.metal-48xl	83.63% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
6.1-m8g.metal-24xl	80.33% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m8g.metal-48xl	80.33% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[kalyazin]

nit: on the 1.14 branch the exclusion will probably be permanent, rather than temporary (I don't think we'll backport the replacement unless there are actual CVEs on bincode) (I'm fine leaving the commit as is, just noting it down)

Fair, thanks for pointing out. Yes, I'd prefer to leave it as is as, if like you said, we have to patch, we'll lift it. Also it's probably lower mental load if cherry-picked patches are as close as possible to the originals.