Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
@smcv can you double-check the security policy bit? iirc this is what was followed when this part of the flatpak repo, but there probably wasn't any security issues reported after it was moved. |
swick
reviewed
Oct 20, 2025
Collaborator
No objections. Are you a member of the flatpak-security list? |
Contributor
Author
|
Don't think so, I am probably in the general list, but I have owner access to the org. So if the reports are forwarded to GH security reports, I can access them. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I will create the
flatpak-builder-1.4.xbranch once this is merged and bump main to 1.5.0