notification: Add platform-data (with activation_token) to ActionInvoked#791
notification: Add platform-data (with activation_token) to ActionInvoked#7913v1n0 wants to merge 3 commits intoflatpak:mainfrom
Conversation
3v1n0
force-pushed
the
notification-activation-token
branch
4 times, most recently
from
ea62c00 to
0b4aca4
Compare
|
@matthiasclasen wdyt about this? At the current time I decided to do an api-break on libportal too, otherwise it could be exposed as an another signal, but it looked overkill to me. |
3v1n0
force-pushed
the
notification-activation-token
branch
from
0b4aca4 to
5c60d2e
Compare
|
I wanted to add a test for checking on the old interface too, but to use libportal there too, we'd need to make a way to override the proto version, and sadly that can't be done once we've the proxy up. So can only test it using the dbus API. |
3v1n0
changed the title
3v1n0
force-pushed
the
notification-activation-token
branch
5 times, most recently
from
f43b77a to
7950c64
Compare
Since some time FDO Notifications introduced the ActivationToken signal to ensure that clients will receive an X11-startup notification ID or a wayland xdg-activation token in order to support stealing-focus prevention protocols. However this isn't supported by xdg-desktop-portal's. So fill the gap by adding a further ActionInvoked signal that includes platform data, where such parameter can be exposed. As per this, bump the protocol version.
Ensure we don't regress in handling version 1 of the notification protocol, we can't do it through libportal as it's checking for the notification version early, we can still ensure all is handled as we expected.
3v1n0
force-pushed
the
notification-activation-token
branch
from
7950c64 to
80e5c1f
Compare
|
Hello, whats the state of this PR? Does the gnome shell know what to do with the activation token, so I can try testing this? |
| <arg type="s" name="app_id"/> | ||
| <arg type="s" name="id"/> | ||
| <arg type="s" name="action"/> | ||
| <arg type="a{sv}" name="platform_data"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Perhaps name this options? It's what the equivalent thing is called in other portals.
| <signal name="ActionInvoked2"> | ||
| <arg type="s" name="id"/> | ||
| <arg type="s" name="action"/> | ||
| <arg type="a{sv}" name="platform_data"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same about calling it options for consistency.
| <arg type="a{sv}" name="platform_data"/> | ||
| <arg type="av" name="parameter"/> | ||
| </signal> | ||
| <property name="version" type="u" access="read"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we not bump the version, here? If version == 2, then ActionInvoked has more parameters, otherwise it doesn't.
Unless we assume that all portal implementations aren't checking the version.
I really don't want to have methods called Foo2; that's a great way to cause legibility issues, as well as the potential for typos. Might as well call this signal with another name entirely.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's not how it works; the apps don't "bind" a version it's compatible with, so we cannot change the type signature.
How do you imagine "app1" that is using the current version of the API to continue to work with a new xdg-desktop-portal if the type signature changes?
I think we just have to live with the fact that there will be a "Foo2" here and there. It's also why it's good to more or less always have a vararg so one can add more properties like this without changing the type signature.
|
The user can now obtain an activation token since notification v2 is now merged. #1298 So i think this can be closed. |
6 participants
Since some time FDO Notifications introduced the ActivationToken signal
to ensure that clients will receive an X11-startup notification ID or a
wayland xdg-activation token in order to support stealing-focus
prevention protocols.
However this isn't supported by xdg-desktop-portal's.
So fill the gap by adding a further activation token.
While it could be added by as an optional parameter, it's just better to
make it explicit.
It needs libportal from flatpak/libportal#88
Implemented in: