Skip to content

Refactor enhance auth logic #23

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 20, 2025
Merged

Refactor enhance auth logic #23

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 20, 2025

Conversation

fulleni
Copy link
Member

@fulleni fulleni commented Jul 20, 2025

Status

READY/IN DEVELOPMENT/HOLD

Description

Type of Change

  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 🛠️ Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ❌ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 🧹 Code refactor
  • ✅ Build configuration change
  • 📝 Documentation
  • 🗑️ Chore

fulleni added 3 commits July 20, 2025 09:37
- Expand import to include dart:async for unawaited operation
- Enhance documentation of completeEmailSignIn method
- Refactor guest user sign-in logic to handle existing account check
- Simplify _convertGuestUserToPermanent method by removing email conflict check
- Invalidate old guest token during account conversion
- Update comments and step numbers in the login process
- Add error logging for token invalidation
- Add current token extraction from Authorization header
- Enhance anonymous-to-permanent account conversion
- Support token invalidation in guest-to-permanent flow
@fulleni fulleni merged commit f046806 into main Jul 20, 2025
1 check failed
@fulleni fulleni deleted the refactor_enhance_auth_logic branch July 20, 2025 08:54
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @fulleni, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly refactors and enhances the authentication logic, particularly for guest users transitioning to permanent accounts. The completeEmailSignIn method has been updated to provide a more sophisticated flow, allowing guest users to either convert their temporary account into a new permanent one or sign into an existing permanent account if their email is already registered. This includes robust handling of token invalidation and guest account cleanup, leading to a more secure and seamless user experience.

Highlights

  • Enhanced Guest User Authentication Flow: The completeEmailSignIn method now intelligently handles guest user sign-in attempts, distinguishing between converting a guest account to a new permanent one and signing into an existing permanent account.
  • Guest to Existing Account Sign-in: If a guest user signs in with an email already associated with a permanent account, the system now logs them into the existing account, invalidates their old guest token, and deletes the temporary guest account.
  • Guest Account Conversion Refinement: The logic for converting a guest account to a new permanent account has been streamlined, with the responsibility of checking for existing emails moved to the completeEmailSignIn method, simplifying the _convertGuestUserToPermanent helper.
  • Token Invalidation & Cleanup: The completeEmailSignIn method now accepts and uses the current authentication token to invalidate the old guest token upon successful sign-in or conversion. It also includes fire-and-forget cleanup for orphaned guest accounts.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request refactors the authentication logic, primarily enhancing how guest users are handled when they sign in with an email. The new logic correctly distinguishes between converting a guest to a new permanent user and signing into a pre-existing account, abandoning the guest session. The changes are well-documented and improve the robustness of the sign-in flow. The review includes suggestions to refactor a portion of the logic to improve clarity and maintainability.

Comment on lines +72 to +78
// Extract the current token from the Authorization header, if it exists.
// This is needed for the guest-to-permanent flow to invalidate the old token.
final authHeader = context.request.headers[HttpHeaders.authorizationHeader];
String? currentToken;
if (authHeader != null && authHeader.startsWith('Bearer ')) {
currentToken = authHeader.substring(7);
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Consider extracting the token extraction logic into a separate helper function for better readability and maintainability. This also encapsulates the token format knowledge in one place.

String? _extractTokenFromHeader(Map<String, String> headers) {
  final authHeader = headers[HttpHeaders.authorizationHeader];
  if (authHeader != null && authHeader.startsWith('Bearer ')) {
    return authHeader.substring(7);
  }
  return null;
}

// Usage:
final currentToken = _extractTokenFromHeader(context.request.headers);

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant