-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Fix bugs #60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
- Replace hardcoded 'app_config' with constant kRemoteConfigId - Rename variable 'appConfig' to 'remoteConfig' for clarity - Update log message to use 'Remote Config' instead of 'AppConfig' - Improve code readability by formatting the emit statement
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @fulleni, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses several issues by refining how remote configuration is fetched and handled, updating the initialization of the HTTP client to align with recent library changes, and bumping the version of the ht-http-client
dependency. These changes collectively aim to improve the application's stability and maintainability.
Highlights
- Configuration Handling Refinement: The
AppBloc
now useskRemoteConfigId
instead of a hardcoded string for fetching configuration and renames the local variable fromappConfig
toremoteConfig
for improved clarity and consistency. - HTTP Client Initialization Update: The
isWeb
parameter has been removed from theHtHttpClient
constructor inbootstrap.dart
, adapting to changes in the underlyinght-http-client
library. - Dependency Version Update: The
pubspec.lock
file has been updated to reference a newer commit (3c50cd08...
) for theht-http-client
git dependency.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request updates a dependency (ht-http-client
), renames a variable for clarity, and replaces a hardcoded string with a constant. The changes appear to be functional fixes and minor refactorings.
I've added one comment regarding the use of print()
for logging. Switching to a dedicated logging library would be a significant improvement for maintainability and debugging.
For future pull requests, please provide a more descriptive title and fill out the description to give reviewers better context for the changes.
print( | ||
'[AppBloc] AppConfig fetched successfully. ID: ${appConfig.id} for user: ${state.user!.id}', | ||
'[AppBloc] Remote Config fetched successfully. ID: ${remoteConfig.id} for user: ${state.user!.id}', | ||
); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using print()
for logging is generally discouraged in production applications. It's better to use a dedicated logging package (like package:logging
, which seems to be used in bootstrap.dart
) to have more control over log levels, output, and performance.
Benefits of using a Logger
:
- Log Levels: Differentiate between debug, info, warning, and error messages.
- Configurability: Easily enable/disable or redirect logs for different build environments (e.g., disable verbose logs in release builds).
- Structured Logging: Provides more context and is easier to parse by logging services.
Consider injecting a Logger
instance into AppBloc
and using it for all logging throughout the file.
Description
Type of Change