refactor(authentication): improve cooldown timer management #65
Conversation
- Fixed a memory leak in AuthenticationBloc by ensuring the cooldown timer is properly cancelled when the BLoC is closed. - Removed redundant logic from the RequestCodePage UI, making the AuthenticationBloc the single source of truth for cooldown state transitions.
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @fulleni, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request refactors the authentication cooldown timer management to centralize state handling within the AuthenticationBloc and addresses a potential memory leak by ensuring proper timer cancellation. The changes streamline the cooldown logic and improve the overall robustness of the authentication flow.
Highlights
- Memory Leak Fix: I've addressed a potential memory leak in the
AuthenticationBlocby ensuring that the_cooldownTimeris properly cancelled when the BLoC is closed. This prevents the timer from continuing to run and hold onto resources after the BLoC is no longer needed. - Centralized Cooldown Management: I've refactored the cooldown timer logic to centralize its management within the
AuthenticationBloc. This makes the BLoC the single source of truth for cooldown state transitions, improving consistency and maintainability. - UI Simplification: I've removed redundant cooldown event dispatching logic from the
RequestCodePageUI. The UI no longer needs to explicitly tell theAuthenticationBlocwhen the cooldown is complete, as the BLoC now manages this internally via its own timer.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The changes to centralize cooldown logic within the AuthenticationBloc and fix the memory leak are great improvements for maintainability and correctness. There's a potential race condition with delayed timers that could affect users on mobile platforms when the app is backgrounded.
Description
Type of Change