Skip to content

Feature_create_source_within_content_management #16

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 2, 2025

Conversation

fulleni
Copy link
Member

@fulleni fulleni commented Jul 2, 2025

Status

READY

Description

Feature_create_source_within_content_management

Type of Change

  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 🛠️ Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ❌ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 🧹 Code refactor
  • ✅ Build configuration change
  • 📝 Documentation
  • 🗑️ Chore

fulleni added 6 commits July 2, 2025 13:38
- Defines CreateSourceStatus enum
- Implements CreateSourceState class
- Adds state properties and copyWith method
- Includes basic form validation
- Uses Equatable for state comparison
- Manages state for source creation form
- Handles input changes for source fields
- Submits new source data to repository
- Loads country data for headquarters selection
- Implements error handling for API calls
- Implements UI for new source creation
- Integrates CreateSourceBloc for state
- Adds form fields for source details
- Handles loading, success, and error states
- Connects to source and country repositories
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @fulleni, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request delivers the end-to-end functionality for creating new 'Source' records in the content management section. It encompasses the necessary state management, user interface components, and integration into the application's navigation and internationalization framework, providing a complete and usable feature for users to add new sources.

Highlights

  • New Feature: Create Source: I've introduced a complete new feature that allows users to create new 'Source' entities within the content management system. This includes the full user interface for inputting source details.
  • State Management (BLoC): A dedicated CreateSourceBloc has been implemented to manage the state and logic for the source creation process. This BLoC handles form field changes, data loading (e.g., countries for headquarters), form validation, and submission to the data repository, along with robust error handling.
  • UI Implementation: A new CreateSourcePage has been added, providing a user-friendly form with fields for source name, description, URL, type, language, and headquarters. It integrates seamlessly with the BLoC to provide real-time feedback and handle submission states.
  • Localization and Routing: New localization strings for 'Create Source' and success messages have been added for both English and Arabic. The application's router has also been updated to correctly navigate to the new CreateSourcePage, replacing a previous placeholder.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces the feature to create a new source within the content management section. I've identified high-priority issues related to type safety and state management correctness that should be addressed.

emit(state.copyWith(status: CreateSourceStatus.loading));
try {
final countriesResponse = await _countriesRepository.readAll();
final countries = (countriesResponse as PaginatedResponse<Country>).items;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The direct cast as PaginatedResponse<Country> is unsafe and could lead to a runtime crash if _countriesRepository.readAll() returns a different type. It's safer to perform a type check and handle unexpected responses gracefully.

Comment on lines +49 to +71
CreateSourceState copyWith({
CreateSourceStatus? status,
String? name,
String? description,
String? url,
ValueGetter<SourceType?>? sourceType,
String? language,
ValueGetter<Country?>? headquarters,
List<Country>? countries,
String? errorMessage,
}) {
return CreateSourceState(
status: status ?? this.status,
name: name ?? this.name,
description: description ?? this.description,
url: url ?? this.url,
sourceType: sourceType != null ? sourceType() : this.sourceType,
language: language ?? this.language,
headquarters: headquarters != null ? headquarters() : this.headquarters,
countries: countries ?? this.countries,
errorMessage: errorMessage,
);
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The errorMessage in copyWith defaults to null if not provided, potentially clearing existing error messages. Use the ValueGetter pattern to avoid this, similar to sourceType and headquarters.

  CreateSourceState copyWith({
    CreateSourceStatus? status,
    String? name,
    String? description,
    String? url,
    ValueGetter<SourceType?>? sourceType,
    String? language,
    ValueGetter<Country?>? headquarters,
    List<Country>? countries,
    ValueGetter<String?>? errorMessage,
  }) {
    return CreateSourceState(
      status: status ?? this.status,
      name: name ?? this.name,
      description: description ?? this.description,
      url: url ?? this.url,
      sourceType: sourceType != null ? sourceType() : this.sourceType,
      language: language ?? this.language,
      headquarters: headquarters != null ? headquarters() : this.headquarters,
      countries: countries ?? this.countries,
      errorMessage: errorMessage != null ? errorMessage() : this.errorMessage,
    );
  }

@fulleni fulleni merged commit 6db818d into main Jul 2, 2025
1 check failed
@fulleni fulleni deleted the feature_create_source_within_content_management branch July 2, 2025 12:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant