Skip to content

Refactor enhance app config UI #31

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 14, 2025
Merged

Conversation

fulleni
Copy link
Member

@fulleni fulleni commented Jul 14, 2025

Status

READY/IN DEVELOPMENT/HOLD

Description

Type of Change

  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 🛠️ Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ❌ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 🧹 Code refactor
  • ✅ Build configuration change
  • 📝 Documentation
  • 🗑️ Chore

fulleni added 3 commits July 14, 2025 18:39
- Added tabbed interface for better organization.
- Replaced ExpansionTiles with TabBarView.
- Improved section descriptions for clarity.
- Updated UI for better user experience.
- Added maintenance and force update sections.
- Improved descriptions for clarity
- Renamed tabs for better UX
- Added new sections for settings
- Removed redundant descriptions
- Updated translations for all languages
- Replaced hardcoded strings with l10n
- Improved UI readability and maintainability
- Updated tab labels and descriptions
- Updated expansion tile titles and descriptions
- Minor formatting improvements
@fulleni fulleni merged commit 985f093 into main Jul 14, 2025
1 check failed
@fulleni fulleni deleted the refactor_enhance_app_config_ui branch July 14, 2025 17:51
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @fulleni, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a significant refactor of the App Configuration user interface, transitioning from a single scrollable list of settings to a more organized tab-based navigation. This change aims to enhance usability by categorizing settings into intuitive sections, making it quicker for users to find and manage specific application configurations. The refactor also includes comprehensive updates to localization strings to align with the new UI structure and improve overall clarity.

Highlights

  • UI Refactor: The App Configuration page has been significantly refactored to introduce a tab-based navigation system, enhancing organization and user experience.
  • Categorized Settings: Settings are now logically grouped under new 'Feed', 'Advertisements', and 'General' tabs, making it easier for users to locate specific configurations.
  • Improved Modularity: The previous 'App Operational Status' section has been split into distinct 'Maintenance Mode' and 'Force App Update' sections, improving code organization and clarity.
  • Localization Updates: New and updated localization strings provide clearer titles and descriptions for the various configuration sections, aligning with the new UI structure and improving overall clarity.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request refactors the App Configuration UI with tab-based navigation, improving organization and usability. Key issues identified include duplicate keys in .arb files, a missing warning message, and redundant code. Addressing these will enhance the UI's stability and quality.

Comment on lines +172 to 175
"forceUpdateDescription": "تكوين تحديثات التطبيق الإلزامية للمستخدمين.",
"@forceUpdateDescription": {
"description": "وصف قسم فرض تحديث التطبيق"
},

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

This change introduces a new forceUpdateDescription key, but an older key with the same name already exists in this file. This creates a duplicate key in the .arb file, which is invalid and will likely cause localization generation to fail or behave unexpectedly. Please remove the old forceUpdateDescription key to resolve this.

Comment on lines +172 to 175
"forceUpdateDescription": "Configure mandatory app updates for users.",
"@forceUpdateDescription": {
"description": "Description for the Force App Update section"
},

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

This change introduces a new forceUpdateDescription key, but an older key with the same name already exists in this file. This creates a duplicate key in the .arb file, which is invalid and will likely cause localization generation to fail or behave unexpectedly. Please remove the old forceUpdateDescription key to resolve this.

Comment on lines 189 to 193
children: [
_buildAppStatusSection(context, remoteConfig),
_buildMaintenanceSection(context, remoteConfig),
const SizedBox(height: AppSpacing.lg),
_buildForceUpdateSection(context, remoteConfig),
],

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The refactoring split _buildAppStatusSection into more focused widgets, which is great for clarity. However, the important warning message l10n.appOperationalStatusWarning is no longer displayed. Given the critical nature of these settings, this warning should be restored and made visible within the "General" tab, perhaps above the two new ExpansionTile widgets, to ensure administrators are aware of the impact of their changes.

                  children: [
                    Text(
                      l10n.appOperationalStatusWarning,
                      style: Theme.of(context).textTheme.bodyMedium?.copyWith(
                            color: Theme.of(context).colorScheme.error,
                            fontWeight: FontWeight.bold,
                          ),
                    ),
                    const SizedBox(height: AppSpacing.lg),
                    _buildMaintenanceSection(context, remoteConfig),
                    const SizedBox(height: AppSpacing.lg),
                    _buildForceUpdateSection(context, remoteConfig),
                  ],

Comment on lines +1334 to 1338
final currentMap = Map<FeedActionType, int>.from(
_getDaysMap(accountActionConfig),
);
final updatedMap = Map<FeedActionType, int>.from(currentMap)
..[actionType] = value;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

There's a redundant map creation here. currentMap is created as a copy of the map from _getDaysMap, and then updatedMap is created as another copy of currentMap. This is inefficient. You can create the updatedMap directly from the result of _getDaysMap in a single step, which is more concise and performant.

            final updatedMap = Map<FeedActionType, int>.from(
              _getDaysMap(accountActionConfig),
            )..update(actionType, (value) => value, ifAbsent: () => value);

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant