Add syntactic inference for no-panic#1417
Open
ninehusky wants to merge 77 commits intoflux-rs:mainfrom
Open
Conversation
ninehusky
commented
Jan 9, 2026
… answer to something
Contributor
Author
|
@nilehmann wanted to ping this and bring it to your attention! don't worry if you can't get to it till monday. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We know we can mark a function as
no_panicautomatically if all of its dependencies areno_panic. This PR tracks the optimization to lessen the burden of declaring a moduleno_panic. I wonder what a way to evaluate this would be... maybe I can run on Tock with and without this optimization and see how manyextern_specsI need to add?