Turn 50-point stories into 3-8 point stories in 60 seconds.
Your user story takes 2-3 sprints instead of 1. Why?
It bundles 5+ features into 1 story.
Copy-paste prompts for AI-assisted story breakdown. See docs/ for Agile fundamentals to use with AI.
Primary audience: Product Owners without technical background
These prompts translate technical complexity into simple terms so you can create realistic stories without needing to understand code.
Can also be used by:
- Software Engineers (breaking down their own work)
- QA Engineers (understanding test scope)
- Technical Product Owners (with codebase knowledge)
Why use AI for story breakdown?
Team benefits:
- Save time: Break down stories in 60 seconds instead of hours
- Reduce effort: AI scans code and extracts context automatically
- Improve collaboration: Clear stories = engineers know what to build, QA knows what to test, PO tracks progress
End user benefits:
- Faster delivery: Small stories ship in days, not weeks
- Better quality: Each story is independently testable
- More predictable: Teams deliver on time with realistic estimates
Quick breakdown without technical context:
- Open the Break Down Large Story prompt
- Copy → Paste into ChatGPT/Claude with your story
- Done. You have 3-8 point stories with acceptance criteria
Use when: Business-only features, UI changes, or no codebase access.
For Product Owners with codebase access:
Collaborate with Claude Code in terminal to scan your codebase first:
- Open terminal in your codebase with Claude Code
- Use Scan Codebase for Context to get non-technical overview
- AI scans actual code files (no guessing!)
- Extracts key components, services, dependencies
- Translates technical details into simple terms
- Outputs actionable breakdown points
- Copy context from AI's findings
- Use Break Down Large Story with technical context
- Get realistic breakdown based on real architecture
Why codebase scanning matters:
- ✅ Eliminates AI hallucination - AI reads actual code, doesn't guess
- ✅ Discovers hidden dependencies (3rd party APIs, shared services)
- ✅ Accurate complexity from actual code, not assumptions
- ✅ Engineers trust estimates (based on code they wrote)
- ✅ Fewer "we didn't know it touches X" surprises mid-sprint
Use when: Technical features, service integrations, database changes.
Before: 1 story, 50 points, took 6 weeks
After: 10 stories, 48 points total, delivered in 6 weeks (on time)
- Break Down Large Story → Story is too large or bundles multiple features
- Rewrite Correct Format → Story is unclear
- Scan Codebase for Context → Understand existing implementation (use with Claude Code)
Have a recurring problem that needs a prompt solution? We want to hear about it!
Suggest a new prompt:
- File an issue using the "Prompt Idea" template
- Describe your problem and how often you face it
- If it's recurring (not a one-time issue), we'll create a prompt
Improve existing prompts: Submit a Pull Request with before/after examples
See CONTRIBUTING.md for full guidelines.
Why frequency matters? One-time problems don't need prompts. We focus on recurring pain points.