Ar/tictactoe

[ajroberts0417]

Important

Set up a basic React and TypeScript project for a Tic-Tac-Toe app using Vite, including configuration for TypeScript, ESLint, and Vite.

• Setup:
  • Initialize a new React project with TypeScript using Vite in index.html, main.tsx, and App.tsx.
  • Add basic styling in App.css and index.css.
  • Configure TypeScript with tsconfig.app.json and tsconfig.node.json.
  • Set up ESLint with eslint.config.js for TypeScript and React.
  • Add Vite configuration in vite.config.ts.
• Dependencies:
  • Add React and React-DOM as dependencies in package.json.
  • Add development dependencies for TypeScript, ESLint, and Vite.
• Misc:
  • Add .gitignore for common Node.js and editor files.
  • Add README.md with basic project structure.

^{This description was created by for 7532b50. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to 7532b50 in 1 minute and 59 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 374 lines of code in 14 files
• Skipped 3 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 9 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. tictactoe/.gitignore:1

• Draft comment:
  The .gitignore is comprehensive. Consider updating it if new build artifacts (e.g. Bun cache directories) are added in the future.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 20% <= threshold 50% None

2. tictactoe/README.md:1

• Draft comment:
  Consider expanding usage instructions and adding a trailing newline.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50% <= threshold 50% None

3. tictactoe/eslint.config.js:7

• Draft comment:
  Verify that the tseslint.config setup and extended recommended rules fully cover your project requirements.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 30% <= threshold 50% None

4. tictactoe/index.html:5

• Draft comment:
  Ensure that the favicon '/vite.svg' is present and correctly referenced.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50% <= threshold 50% None

5. tictactoe/package.json:13

• Draft comment:
  React version '^19.1.0' is unusual; please confirm if this experimental version is intended over the stable '^18.x' release.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% One of our rules is to NOT comment on dependency versions we don't recognize. Additionally, we're told to NOT ask authors to confirm their intentions. This comment does both - it questions a dependency version choice and asks for confirmation of intent. The author likely chose this version deliberately. The experimental version could cause stability issues in production. Maybe this is worth flagging despite our rules? Our rules are clear about not commenting on dependency choices. We should trust the author's judgment on version selection. Delete the comment as it violates our rules about commenting on dependencies and asking for confirmation of intent.

6. tictactoe/src/App.tsx:6

• Draft comment:
  The App component returns an empty fragment. Add content or remove redundant markup if not needed.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50% <= threshold 50% None

7. tictactoe/tsconfig.app.json:11

• Draft comment:
  Using 'bundler' for moduleResolution is non-standard; ensure this setting is supported by your tooling.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The "bundler" moduleResolution is actually a standard setting for modern TypeScript projects using bundlers like Vite or webpack. This is part of a common configuration pattern with other related settings like allowImportingTsExtensions and verbatimModuleSyntax. The comment seems to be raising unnecessary concern about a valid configuration. The comment might be raising a valid concern if this is an older project or using non-standard build tools. TypeScript versions before 5.0 don't support this setting. Since this is a new file being added (not a modification), we can assume the author is setting up a new project with modern tooling. The presence of other modern TypeScript features suggests this is using recent TypeScript versions. The comment should be deleted as it raises unnecessary concerns about a valid and common configuration setting in modern TypeScript projects.

8. tictactoe/tsconfig.node.json:10

• Draft comment:
  Double-check that 'bundler' module resolution and related advanced options are compatible with your Node build environment.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is asking the PR author to double-check compatibility, which violates the rule against asking the author to confirm or ensure behavior. It does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue.

9. tictactoe/README.md:5

• Draft comment:
  Minor note: Consider capitalizing 'React' in 'react app' to reflect the proper noun. This will help ensure consistency and clarity.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% This is a purely stylistic suggestion about capitalization in documentation. While technically correct that React is typically capitalized, this kind of minor documentation nitpick doesn't warrant a PR comment. It's not addressing any code logic or meaningful issues. The meaning is perfectly clear either way. React's official documentation does consistently capitalize it, so there's a valid argument for maintaining official branding. While correct, this level of nitpicking on documentation capitalization doesn't meet the bar of "clearly a code change required" per the review rules. It's too minor to warrant a comment. Delete this comment as it's an unimportant stylistic suggestion that doesn't impact functionality or code quality.

Workflow ID: wflow_yK8rIogeEKxO36kM

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}