-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
Improve the Lifetime message documentation
#259
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Skipping release notes, I think they are not necessary for such a small documentation change. |
| // If the `end_timestamp` is not set, the asset is considered to be in | ||
| // operation until the end of the system's operational history. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The "end of history" part reads a bit odd, because history indicates past tense. I feel that phrase does not add anything here, and can be removed:
| // If the `end_timestamp` is not set, the asset is considered to be in | |
| // operation until the end of the system's operational history. | |
| // If the `end_timestamp` is not set, the asset is considered to be in | |
| // operation. |
The same comment applies to other instances where end-timestamp is being documented.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about "... is considered to be in operation indefinitely in the future"? I would like to make it explicit that it is in operation now but also at any time in the future.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good. Should then be "indefinitely into the future".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated.
Make the specification of what `Lifetime` message is used for as clear and precise as possible. Signed-off-by: Leandro Lucarella <[email protected]>
8c97ed1 to
cf667ca
Compare
|
Enabling auto-merge. |
tiyash-basu-frequenz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Make the specification of what
Lifetimemessage is used for as clear and precise as possible.Fixes #250.