- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 20
Use PowerManager and PowerDistributor in EV charger control #887
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Closed
      
      
    Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    | Still need to throttling support, add tests, release notes and a fix for the python 3.11 parsing issue that's breaking examples. | 
      
  
  Closed
  
Signed-off-by: Sahas Subramanian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sahas Subramanian <[email protected]>
Earlier it was not consider all possible operational states. Signed-off-by: Sahas Subramanian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sahas Subramanian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sahas Subramanian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sahas Subramanian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sahas Subramanian <[email protected]>
This is exposed through the private `_system_power_bounds` method in the EVChargerPool. Signed-off-by: Sahas Subramanian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sahas Subramanian <[email protected]>
Also remove per-component status tracking support. Signed-off-by: Sahas Subramanian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sahas Subramanian <[email protected]>
This allows the efficient creation of multiple `EVChargerPool` instances for the same set of EV chargers, but with different priorities, while reusing the formulas and bounds by having only a single instance of the `EVChargerPoolReferenceStore` class for any given set of EV chargers. Signed-off-by: Sahas Subramanian <[email protected]>
To be consistent with the other *Pools. Signed-off-by: Sahas Subramanian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sahas Subramanian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sahas Subramanian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sahas Subramanian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sahas Subramanian <[email protected]>
| Superseded by #900 | 
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      Labels
      
    part:actor
  Affects an actor ot the actors utilities (decorator, etc.) 
  
    part:data-pipeline
  Affects the data pipeline 
  
    part:microgrid
  Affects the interactions with the microgrid 
  
    part:tests
  Affects the unit, integration and performance (benchmarks) tests 
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
Closes #872