Merged
Conversation
DavisVaughan
force-pushed
the
feature/remove-raw
branch
from
afc73ca to
e62adb0
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
purrr 1.0.0 deprecated them, and we'd like to remove them from purrr eventually.
I don't really see much usage of them on CRAN:
https://github.com/search?q=org%3Acran%20future_map_raw&type=code
https://github.com/search?q=org%3Acran+future_map2_raw&type=code
https://github.com/search?q=org%3Acran+future_imap_raw&type=code
https://github.com/search?q=org%3Acran+future_invoke_map_raw&type=code
It does look like crossmap was using
future_pmap_rawfor their own wrapper, but we can ask them to remove that, they've already deprecated the function calling ithttps://github.com/search?q=org%3Acran+future_pmap_raw&type=code
I went ahead and opened an issue
rossellhayes/crossmap#15
We can look into a
future_map_vec()to see if that makes any sense, which is what is recommended instead ofmap_raw()these days (afuture_map()followed by a simplify operation).