Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 10, 2025. It is now read-only.

Iss2213 - docs for the test result provider#868

Closed
jadecarino wants to merge 8 commits intomainfrom
iss2213-test-result-provider
Closed

Iss2213 - docs for the test result provider#868
jadecarino wants to merge 8 commits intomainfrom
iss2213-test-result-provider

Conversation

@jadecarino
Copy link
Contributor

Why?

For galasa-dev/projectmanagement#2213

Add documentation for controlling test execution based on the test result with the @TestResultProvider annotation.

jt-nti and others added 6 commits April 2, 2025 16:26
The search api links appear to be failing the link checker for some
reason

Ideally the problem (could be the application ID is not valid any more
for some reason?) should be investigated/fixed, however the broken
link check is holding up unrelated PRs

Signed-off-by: James Taylor <jamest@uk.ibm.com>
The search api links appear to be failing the link checker for some
reason

Ideally the problem (could be the application ID is not valid any more
for some reason?) should be investigated/fixed, however the broken link
check is holding up unrelated PRs
Signed-off-by: Ian Deeley <ian_deeley@uk.ibm.com>
…stFailure not StopOnError

Signed-off-by: Jade Carino <carino_jade@yahoo.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jade Carino <carino_jade@yahoo.co.uk>
@jadecarino jadecarino changed the base branch from main to next May 6, 2025 10:09
@jadecarino jadecarino requested a review from techcobweb May 6, 2025 10:09
@jadecarino jadecarino changed the base branch from next to main May 6, 2025 10:12
techcobweb
techcobweb previously approved these changes May 6, 2025
@jadecarino
Copy link
Contributor Author

Recreated PR here #869

@jadecarino jadecarino closed this May 6, 2025
@jadecarino jadecarino deleted the iss2213-test-result-provider branch May 6, 2025 10:56
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants