Skip to content

fix: use record field id in lack of record uri (#101) - #102

Open
nichtich wants to merge 1 commit into
devfrom
issue-101
Open

fix: use record field id in lack of record uri (#101)#102
nichtich wants to merge 1 commit into
devfrom
issue-101

Conversation

@nichtich

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Only relevant for annotation records.

Only relevant for annotation records.
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.71%. Comparing base (d10baf5) to head (76cd5dc).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #102      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.47%   90.71%   +0.23%     
==========================================
  Files          52       53       +1     
  Lines        1670     1712      +42     
  Branches      671      685      +14     
==========================================
+ Hits         1511     1553      +42     
  Misses        145      145              
  Partials       14       14              
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/components/import/ImportResultList.vue 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant