-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
add test for GDSFactory+ #192
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
joamatab
wants to merge
8
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
test_project_in_gfp
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
655c9f8
add test for gfp
joamatab e42d785
fix pre-commit
joamatab f3e4c03
fix make test
joamatab 63d2baf
fix test
joamatab 2a657af
Refactor GitHub Actions workflow for Python tests
nikosavola eb5971b
Remove gdsfactoryplus from docs dependency group
nikosavola 6dd9349
Run GDSFactory+ from its own dependency group
nikosavola 01ac5fd
No explicit `make install` where not needed
nikosavola File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The GDSFactory+ is running but failing. What is it exactly doing? It seems to fail at many sections where it assumes a layer or cross-section from the generic PDK would be available here. A SLAB90 layer in this PDK does not make sense for example.
.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gdsfactory/pdk.py:713: in get_layer return get_active_pdk().get_layer(layer) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ .venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gdsfactory/pdk.py:524: in get_layer raise ValueError(f"{layer!r} not in PDK {self.name!r} {layer_members}") E ValueError: 'SLAB90' not in PDK 'qpdk' OrderedDict({'M1_DRAW': <LayerMapQPDK.M1_DRAW: 1>, 'M1_ETCH': <LayerMapQPDK.M1_ETCH: 47>, 'M2_DRAW': <LayerMapQPDK.M2_DRAW: 3>, 'M2_ETCH': <LayerMapQPDK.M2_ETCH: 48>, 'AB_DRAW': <LayerMapQPDK.AB_DRAW: 49>, 'AB_VIA': <LayerMapQPDK.AB_VIA: 50>, 'JJ_AREA': <LayerMapQPDK.JJ_AREA: 13>, 'JJ_PATCH': <LayerMapQPDK.JJ_PATCH: 51>, 'IND': <LayerMapQPDK.IND: 52>, 'TSV': <LayerMapQPDK.TSV: 53>, 'DICE': <LayerMapQPDK.DICE: 38>, 'ALN_TOP': <LayerMapQPDK.ALN_TOP: 54>, 'ALN_BOT': <LayerMapQPDK.ALN_BOT: 55>, 'TEXT': <LayerMapQPDK.TEXT: 56>, 'LABEL_SETTINGS': <LayerMapQPDK.LABEL_SETTINGS: 30>, 'LABEL_INSTANCE': <LayerMapQPDK.LABEL_INSTANCE: 46>, 'SIM_AREA': <LayerMapQPDK.SIM_AREA: 57>, 'SIM_ONLY': <LayerMapQPDK.SIM_ONLY: 58>, 'WG': <LayerMapQPDK.WG: 59>})There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@flaport any idea why this is happening?