Skip to content

PTDATA-1790#887

Open
patrick-werner wants to merge 6 commits intomain-stufe-5from
stufe-5/alle/fix/advisor-update-PTDATA-1790
Open

PTDATA-1790#887
patrick-werner wants to merge 6 commits intomain-stufe-5from
stufe-5/alle/fix/advisor-update-PTDATA-1790

Conversation

@patrick-werner
Copy link
Contributor

fix: update display names in JSON and FSH files to German terminology
fix: wrong codes adn/or displays
removed advisor entries caused by bugs in java validator

This pull request updates several example FHIR Observation resources to use German-language display names and improves coding consistency across multiple files. The changes primarily focus on localizing display texts from English to German and updating some SNOMED and LOINC codes and their corresponding display values for greater accuracy and alignment with German healthcare terminology.

Key changes include:

Localization of Display Names:

Code and Display Adjustments for Consistency:

  • Changed SNOMED and LOINC codes and/or display values for EKG leads, body weight measurement methods, and anatomical sites to use more precise or appropriate German concepts. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

Other Coding and Value Updates:

  • Updated value coding for Glasgow Coma Scale and verbal response displays for clarity and age specificity. [1] [2]

* $loinc#11780-4 "Delivery date Estimated from ovulation date"
* $loinc#57063-0 "Delivery date Estimated from quickening date"
* $loinc#11779-6 "Delivery date Estimated from last menstrual period"
* $loinc#11779-6 "Entbindungstermin, geschätzt aus letzter Menstruationsperiode"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@patrick-werner: Gibt es einen Grund dafür, dass wir genau diesen einen Code im VS übersetzen? Für andere Codes in diesem VS gibt es ebenfalls deutsche Displaynamen. Ist das nicht außerdem ein Breaking Change den wir damit vornehmen? Instanzen mit dem ehemaligen englischen Displaynamen werden dadurch vermutlich invalide sein, oder sind die Validatoren da nicht so scharf geschaltet?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants