RFC/Draft for configuration utility

[BeyondEvil]

@bblommers made a wish and I figured why not get the ball rolling?

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.002%) to 94.562% when pulling 218cb36 on BeyondEvil:config-rfc into a31599d on spulec:master.

[BeyondEvil]

Server tests are failing, likely due to the configuration.ini file missing or being in a different/wrong location.

Before I spend time debugging, maybe someone else can chime in with the correct solution to the problem? Afaict it should be present. The docker has the entire repo swallowed and I added the file to the MANIFEST.

Fixed.

[BeyondEvil]

Ping @spulec

[spulec]

So far we have been using the settings file for this type of thing: https://github.com/spulec/moto/blob/master/moto/settings.py

Any thoughts on why this would be better? Or is this something else where it isn't designed to be configurable by the user?

[BeyondEvil]

So far we have been using the settings file for this type of thing: https://github.com/spulec/moto/blob/master/moto/settings.py

Any thoughts on why this would be better? Or is this something else where it isn't designed to be configurable by the user?

A couple of things off the top of my head:

• Provides support for different configurations between Production and Development/Test
• Uses a more idiomatic approach to configuration

Wether or not it's user-configurable is really up to us (implementation).