fix(docs): Remove hard-coded domains from URLs where applicable across all documentation

[jas-kas]

Removing hard-coded domains from URLs where applicable across all Sentry documentation.

This resolves the issue when working locally and navigating through links and you're taken to the Sentry docs prod site instead of local.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
develop-docs	Ready	Preview	Comment	Aug 29, 2025 6:51pm
sentry-docs	Ready	Preview	Comment	Aug 29, 2025 6:51pm

[codecov]

Bundle Report

Changes will increase total bundle size by 25.03kB (0.11%) ⬆️. This is within the configured threshold ✅

Detailed changes

Bundle name	Size	Change
sentry-docs-client-array-push	9.9MB	-6 bytes (-0.0%) ⬇️
sentry-docs-server-cjs	12.55MB	25.04kB (0.2%) ⬆️

Affected Assets, Files, and Routes:

view changes for bundle: sentry-docs-client-array-push

Assets Changed:

Asset Name	Size Change	Total Size	Change (%)
static/chunks/pages/_app-*.js	-3 bytes	882.71kB	-0.0%
static/chunks/8321-*.js	-3 bytes	425.87kB	-0.0%
static/WXAKV9cAVunHOSjfsp3n9/_buildManifest.js (New)	684 bytes	684 bytes	100.0% 🚀
static/WXAKV9cAVunHOSjfsp3n9/_ssgManifest.js (New)	77 bytes	77 bytes	100.0% 🚀
static/b5VIv0qKYSo4hNALiATv7/_buildManifest.js (Deleted)	-684 bytes	0 bytes	-100.0% 🗑️
static/b5VIv0qKYSo4hNALiATv7/_ssgManifest.js (Deleted)	-77 bytes	0 bytes	-100.0% 🗑️

view changes for bundle: sentry-docs-server-cjs

Assets Changed:

Asset Name	Size Change	Total Size	Change (%)
1729.js	-3 bytes	1.78MB	-0.0%
../instrumentation.js	-3 bytes	1.1MB	-0.0%
9523.js	-3 bytes	1.08MB	-0.0%
../app/[[...path]]/page.js.nft.json	8.35kB	788.4kB	1.07%
../app/platform-redirect/page.js.nft.json	8.35kB	788.31kB	1.07%
../app/sitemap.xml/route.js.nft.json	8.35kB	785.79kB	1.07%

[ryan953]

Long term this'd be cool to convert into a lint rule, wired up like the https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-docs/blob/830bbc86fedd9c8461436946c2cf63246a6ad7cc/scripts/lint-404s/main.ts script.

But someone can do that in a followup PR. Short term i don't think we need to let that kind of thing slow down what's really a great #quickwin!

[coolguyzone]

Nice work! This will make the preview experience much smoother.

[chargome]

Nice! 🥇

TBH I don't think we really need to commit the entire script but maybe we can reuse parts of it for a GH action. We could only let this run on the diff of every PR, less expensive this way - leaving this up to @sergical

[sergical]

I have set aside some time to take a look at our 404 action, i will see what's the best usecase for this script/lint rule at that point as well, this is a huge win for now though, thank you @jas-kas!