Skip to content

Conversation

ceorourke
Copy link
Member

@ceorourke ceorourke commented Aug 11, 2025

Redo of #96221 after adding an index to the GroupOpenPeriod's data column on pending_incident_detector_id which should hopefully not result in the error anymore. There are no changes to this PR from the original one.

@ceorourke ceorourke requested review from a team as code owners August 11, 2025 20:46
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Scope: Backend Automatically applied to PRs that change backend components label Aug 11, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@saponifi3d saponifi3d left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🙏

@ceorourke ceorourke merged commit 433839b into master Aug 12, 2025
129 checks passed
@ceorourke ceorourke deleted the ceorourke/redo-write-incidentgroupopenperiods branch August 12, 2025 17:48
@ceorourke ceorourke added the Trigger: Revert Add to a merged PR to revert it (skips CI) label Aug 12, 2025
@getsentry-bot
Copy link
Contributor

PR reverted: 252a381

getsentry-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2025
ceorourke added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2025
3rd attempt at this PR - I merged
#97621 but somehow hit a
[circular import
issue](https://github.com/getsentry/getsentry/actions/runs/16916645085/job/47932103426)
that CI didn't catch. I've rebased after fixing the import issue.

---------

Co-authored-by: Snigdha Sharma <[email protected]>
andrewshie-sentry pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2025
Redo of #96221 after [adding an
index](#97534) to the
`GroupOpenPeriod`'s `data` column on `pending_incident_detector_id`
which should hopefully not result in [the
error](https://sentry.sentry.io/issues/6799376702/) anymore. There are
no changes to this PR from the original one.

---------

Co-authored-by: Snigdha Sharma <[email protected]>
andrewshie-sentry pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2025
andrewshie-sentry pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2025
3rd attempt at this PR - I merged
#97621 but somehow hit a
[circular import
issue](https://github.com/getsentry/getsentry/actions/runs/16916645085/job/47932103426)
that CI didn't catch. I've rebased after fixing the import issue.

---------

Co-authored-by: Snigdha Sharma <[email protected]>
ceorourke added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2025
…low engine (#95487)

Duplicate tests from `subscription_processor.py` but rewritten for
workflow engine. These will be used for single processing to ensure we
don't lose test coverage. This has a lot of tests but isn't
comprehensive, there will be follow up PRs for:
* Anomaly detection tests
* Adding `assert_open_period` and `assert_no_open_period` methods and
adding those to tests (waiting on
#97621)
* Early return scenarios
* 10 minute cooldown tests

---------

Co-authored-by: Colleen O'Rourke <[email protected]>
priscilawebdev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2025
Redo of #96221 after [adding an
index](#97534) to the
`GroupOpenPeriod`'s `data` column on `pending_incident_detector_id`
which should hopefully not result in [the
error](https://sentry.sentry.io/issues/6799376702/) anymore. There are
no changes to this PR from the original one.

---------

Co-authored-by: Snigdha Sharma <[email protected]>
priscilawebdev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2025
priscilawebdev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2025
3rd attempt at this PR - I merged
#97621 but somehow hit a
[circular import
issue](https://github.com/getsentry/getsentry/actions/runs/16916645085/job/47932103426)
that CI didn't catch. I've rebased after fixing the import issue.

---------

Co-authored-by: Snigdha Sharma <[email protected]>
priscilawebdev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2025
…low engine (#95487)

Duplicate tests from `subscription_processor.py` but rewritten for
workflow engine. These will be used for single processing to ensure we
don't lose test coverage. This has a lot of tests but isn't
comprehensive, there will be follow up PRs for:
* Anomaly detection tests
* Adding `assert_open_period` and `assert_no_open_period` methods and
adding those to tests (waiting on
#97621)
* Early return scenarios
* 10 minute cooldown tests

---------

Co-authored-by: Colleen O'Rourke <[email protected]>
andrewshie-sentry pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2025
…low engine (#95487)

Duplicate tests from `subscription_processor.py` but rewritten for
workflow engine. These will be used for single processing to ensure we
don't lose test coverage. This has a lot of tests but isn't
comprehensive, there will be follow up PRs for:
* Anomaly detection tests
* Adding `assert_open_period` and `assert_no_open_period` methods and
adding those to tests (waiting on
#97621)
* Early return scenarios
* 10 minute cooldown tests

---------

Co-authored-by: Colleen O'Rourke <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 28, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Scope: Backend Automatically applied to PRs that change backend components Trigger: Revert Add to a merged PR to revert it (skips CI)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants