tests: a simple backend ut #12039
Closed
tests: a simple backend ut #12039
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
pls refer to: #11958
1.implementation of simple command line tool for verify a specified backend.for expert, this simple command line tool is useless; for beginner, it might be helpful as it clearly illustrates some basic APIs in ggml and ggml-backend.
2.the official tests/test-backend-ops.cpp is a highly-well designed and powerful command line tool for validate a specified backend(might be considered as a powerful CT tool), this simple command line tool would be helpful during dev activities of a specified backend.
3.in the fact, this self-made source file helped me a lot in learning the internals of ggml and ggml-backend-subsystem and troubleshooting various issues with a specific backend.
could anyone help to point out why this simple UT doesn't pass the CI in github? thanks too much.