- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 13.4k
fix wrong template in GLM4-0414 #13140
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
        
      
    
  
     Merged
                    Changes from all commits
      Commits
    
    
            Show all changes
          
          
            6 commits
          
        
        Select commit
          Hold shift + click to select a range
      
      4e0c059
              
                fix wrong template in GLM4-0414
              
              
                matteoserva 0cce580
              
                fix spaces
              
              
                matteoserva cc93292
              
                no bos token since it is already in the template
              
              
                matteoserva 36f927f
              
                moved the chatgml4 check to higher priority
              
              
                matteoserva f44e24b
              
                restored template for old GLM models
              
              
                matteoserva 0128f14
              
                moved the GLM4 template check in the correct place with correct check
              
              
                matteoserva File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
      
      Oops, something went wrong.
        
    
  
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#13099 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure I can do that.
This is the relevant jinja template code. reached when
./llama-server --jinjallama.cpp/common/chat.cpp
Line 651 in e291450
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if the BOS is not added, then what is the reason behind changing it from[gMASK]to<|endoftext|>? it shouldn't crash/props, right?Nvm I see what you mean