Skip to content

Create karpenter custom resources in workload clusters #268

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 35 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fiunchinho
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it

Checklist

  • Update changelog in CHANGELOG.md.

@fiunchinho fiunchinho self-assigned this Jun 24, 2025
@fiunchinho fiunchinho force-pushed the manage-karpenter-wc-crs branch 2 times, most recently from dc1b90f to e18c5b6 Compare June 30, 2025 14:07
@fiunchinho fiunchinho force-pushed the manage-karpenter-wc-crs branch 5 times, most recently from 7355246 to b81dc60 Compare July 14, 2025 14:47
@fiunchinho fiunchinho changed the title wip Create karpenter custom resources in workload clusters Jul 17, 2025
@fiunchinho fiunchinho force-pushed the manage-karpenter-wc-crs branch from 7ecbf14 to bfa3f0c Compare July 17, 2025 14:02
@fiunchinho fiunchinho force-pushed the manage-karpenter-wc-crs branch from bfa3f0c to 0482904 Compare July 17, 2025 14:18
@fiunchinho fiunchinho force-pushed the manage-karpenter-wc-crs branch from 7367893 to cc1af99 Compare July 21, 2025 08:01
conditions.MarkEC2NodeClassNotCreated(karpenterMachinePool, conditions.VersionSkewBlockedReason, message)
conditions.MarkNodePoolNotCreated(karpenterMachinePool, conditions.VersionSkewBlockedReason, message)

return fmt.Errorf("version skew policy violation: %s", message)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we requeue rather than return error?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I changed it to requeue instead.

@fiunchinho fiunchinho marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2025 12:45
@fiunchinho fiunchinho requested a review from a team as a code owner July 29, 2025 12:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant