-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
config: read both home and xdg config in list --global
[do not submit]
#1926
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
config: read both home and xdg config in list --global
[do not submit]
#1926
Conversation
Do not submit this commit; it's only intended for debugging. Signed-off-by: Delilah Ashley Wu <[email protected]>
Not actually required for the fix. I just wanted to do it hehe. Could always split it out to another patch or keep the current code. Signed-off-by: Delilah Ashley Wu <[email protected]>
Based on https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]. We assumed that git config is always read from a single file, but that is not the case for the global scope, which takes inputs from both `$HOME/.gitconfig` and `$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/config`. The existing `do_git_config_sequence()` function respects both locations, in addition to other scopes. Hence, modify the function to support reading only the global scope, by introducing new flags that exclude everything else (i.e. `ignore_system` and `ignore_global`). I've assumed that `config_source->scope == CONFIG_SCOPE_GLOBAL` iff `--global` is specified. This allows us to call the modified `do_git_config_sequence()` function when reading only the the global scope, rather than calling `git_config_from_file_with_options(..., "~/.gitconfig", ...)`. This fixes the issue where `XDG_CONFIG_HOME` location is ignored in `git config list --global`. NB: The `ignore_global` flag is not set to truthy anywhere, so the `if (!opts->ignore_global)` condition is always met. We can actually remove this unused flag if we want. The `opts->source.file` is still set in `builtin/config.c` because it is required for write operations. I thought that this would be misleading because there is no single source of truth for the source files in the global scope. So I added comments that will (hopefully) clarify this. Reported-by: Jade Lovelace <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Glen Choo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Delilah Ashley Wu <[email protected]>
The expected existing behaviour for `git config list` is: A. Without `--global`, it should not bail on unreadable/non-existent global config files. B. With `--global`, it should bail when both `$HOME/.gitconfig` and `$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/config` are unreadable. It should not bail when one or more of them is readable. The previous patch introduced a regression in scenario B; running `git config list --global` would not fail after encountering an unreadable global config file, e.g. `GIT_CONFIG_GLOBAL=does-not-exist git config list --global` would exit with status code 0. Given that `config_source->scope == CONFIG_SCOPE_GLOBAL` iff `--global` is specified, we can use this to determine whether to bail or not. When both global config files are unreadable and we are restricted to reading only the global scope, adjust the return code to be non-zero. Signed-off-by: Delilah Ashley Wu <[email protected]>
Checks for regressions in two existing behaviours of `git config list`,as described in the previous commit message: A. Without `--global`, it should not bail on unreadable/non-existent global config files. B. With `--global`, it should bail when both `$HOME/.gitconfig` and `$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/config` are unreadable. It should not bail when one or more of them is readable. Also adds a test for the issue that this contribution solves. C. `git config list --global` should include contents from both `$HOME/.gitconfig` and `$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/config` (assuming they are readable), not just the former. Signed-off-by: Delilah Ashley Wu <[email protected]>
Intentional --no-signoff; this commit should not be included in the final patch series.
list --global
list --global
[do not submit]
Welcome to GitGitGadgetHi @delilahw, and welcome to GitGitGadget, the GitHub App to send patch series to the Git mailing list from GitHub Pull Requests. Please make sure that either:
You can CC potential reviewers by adding a footer to the PR description with the following syntax:
NOTE: DO NOT copy/paste your CC list from a previous GGG PR's description, Also, it is a good idea to review the commit messages one last time, as the Git project expects them in a quite specific form:
It is in general a good idea to await the automated test ("Checks") in this Pull Request before contributing the patches, e.g. to avoid trivial issues such as unportable code. Contributing the patchesBefore you can contribute the patches, your GitHub username needs to be added to the list of permitted users. Any already-permitted user can do that, by adding a comment to your PR of the form Both the person who commented An alternative is the channel
Once on the list of permitted usernames, you can contribute the patches to the Git mailing list by adding a PR comment If you want to see what email(s) would be sent for a After you submit, GitGitGadget will respond with another comment that contains the link to the cover letter mail in the Git mailing list archive. Please make sure to monitor the discussion in that thread and to address comments and suggestions (while the comments and suggestions will be mirrored into the PR by GitGitGadget, you will still want to reply via mail). If you do not want to subscribe to the Git mailing list just to be able to respond to a mail, you can download the mbox from the Git mailing list archive (click the curl -g --user "<EMailAddress>:<Password>" \
--url "imaps://imap.gmail.com/INBOX" -T /path/to/raw.txt To iterate on your change, i.e. send a revised patch or patch series, you will first want to (force-)push to the same branch. You probably also want to modify your Pull Request description (or title). It is a good idea to summarize the revision by adding something like this to the cover letter (read: by editing the first comment on the PR, i.e. the PR description):
To send a new iteration, just add another PR comment with the contents: Need help?New contributors who want advice are encouraged to join [email protected], where volunteers who regularly contribute to Git are willing to answer newbie questions, give advice, or otherwise provide mentoring to interested contributors. You must join in order to post or view messages, but anyone can join. You may also be able to find help in real time in the developer IRC channel, |
There are issues in commit ace72c4: |
There are issues in commit 8c209c6: |
This reverts commit 8d98751.
There are issues in commit ace72c4: |
There are issues in commit 8c209c6: |
There are issues in commit 936fe97: |
This is Lilah's working tree with additional commits that may not be relevant to the contribution. They will be excluded from the final patch series, but I want to use CI to check my changes (e.g. commit message linting, which isn't normally included in forks' CI) 😇