Skip to content

Java: Added new query java/visible-for-testing-abuse #20178

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ ql/java/ql/src/Violations of Best Practice/Exception Handling/IgnoreExceptionalR
ql/java/ql/src/Violations of Best Practice/Exception Handling/NumberFormatException.ql
ql/java/ql/src/Violations of Best Practice/Implementation Hiding/AbstractToConcreteCollection.ql
ql/java/ql/src/Violations of Best Practice/Implementation Hiding/ExposeRepresentation.ql
ql/java/ql/src/Violations of Best Practice/Implementation Hiding/VisibleForTestingAbuse.ql
ql/java/ql/src/Violations of Best Practice/Naming Conventions/AmbiguousOuterSuper.ql
ql/java/ql/src/Violations of Best Practice/Naming Conventions/ConfusingMethodNames.ql
ql/java/ql/src/Violations of Best Practice/Naming Conventions/ConfusingOverloading.ql
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ ql/java/ql/src/Violations of Best Practice/Exception Handling/IgnoreExceptionalR
ql/java/ql/src/Violations of Best Practice/Exception Handling/NumberFormatException.ql
ql/java/ql/src/Violations of Best Practice/Implementation Hiding/AbstractToConcreteCollection.ql
ql/java/ql/src/Violations of Best Practice/Implementation Hiding/ExposeRepresentation.ql
ql/java/ql/src/Violations of Best Practice/Implementation Hiding/VisibleForTestingAbuse.ql
ql/java/ql/src/Violations of Best Practice/Naming Conventions/AmbiguousOuterSuper.ql
ql/java/ql/src/Violations of Best Practice/Naming Conventions/ConfusingMethodNames.ql
ql/java/ql/src/Violations of Best Practice/Naming Conventions/ConfusingOverloading.ql
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
# J-T-003: Accessing any method, field or class annotated with `@VisibleForTesting` from production code is discouraged

Accessing class members annotated with `@VisibleForTesting` from production code goes against the intention of the annotation and may indicate programmer error.

## Overview

The `@VisibleForTesting` serves to increase visibility of methods, fields or classes for the purposes of testing. Accessing methods, fields or classes that are annotated with `@VisibleForTesting` in production code (not test code) abuses the intention of the annotation.

## Recommendation

Only access methods, fields or classes annotated with `@VisibleForTesting` from test code. If the visibility of the methods, fields or classes should generally be relaxed, use Java language access modifiers.

## Example

```java
public class Annotated {
@VisibleForTesting static int f(){}
}

/* src/test/java/Test.java */
int i = Annotated.f(); // COMPLIANT

/* src/main/Source.java */
int i = Annotated.f(); // NON_COMPLIANT

```

## Implementation notes

This rule alerts on any implementation of the annotation `VisibleForTesting`, regardless of where it is provided from.

The rule also uses the following logic to determine what an abuse of the annotation is:

1) If public or protected member/type is annotated with `VisibleForTesting`, it's assumed that package-private access is enough for production code. Therefore the rule alerts when a public or protected member/type annotated with `VisibleForTesting` is used outside of its declaring package.
2) If package-private member/type is annotated with `VisibleForTesting`, it's assumed that private access is enough for production code. Therefore the rule alerts when a package-private member/type annotated with `VisibleForTesting` is used outside its declaring class.

## References
- Example Specific Implementation of a VisibleForTesting Annotation: [AssertJ VisibleForTesting](https://javadoc.io/doc/org.assertj/assertj-core/latest/org/assertj/core/util/VisibleForTesting.html)
- Assumptions of what level of access is permittable for each access modifier and the annotation: [JetBrains VisibleForTesting](https://javadoc.io/doc/org.jetbrains/annotations/22.0.0/org/jetbrains/annotations/VisibleForTesting.html)
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
/**
* @id java/visible-for-testing-abuse
* @name Accessing any method, field or class annotated with `@VisibleForTesting` from production code is discouraged
* @description Accessing any method, field or class annotated with `@VisibleForTesting` from
* production code goes against the intention of the annotation and may indicate
* programmer error.
* @kind problem
* @precision high
* @problem.severity warning
* @tags quality
* maintainability
* readability
*/

import java

/**
* A `Callable` is within some `RefType`
*/
predicate isWithinType(Callable c, RefType t) { c.getDeclaringType() = t }

/**
* A `Callable` is within same package as the `RefType`
*/
predicate isWithinPackage(Callable c, RefType t) {
c.getDeclaringType().getPackage() = t.getPackage()
}

predicate withinStaticContext(NestedClass c) {
c.isStatic() or
c.(AnonymousClass).getClassInstanceExpr().getEnclosingCallable().isStatic() // JLS 15.9.2
}

RefType enclosingInstanceType(Class inner) {
not withinStaticContext(inner) and
result = inner.(NestedClass).getEnclosingType()
}

class OuterClass extends Class {
OuterClass() { this = enclosingInstanceType+(_) }
}

/**
* An innerclass is accessed outside of its outerclass
* and also outside of its fellow inner parallel classes
*/
predicate isWithinDirectOuterClassOrSiblingInner(
Callable classInstanceEnclosing, RefType typeBeingConstructed
) {
exists(NestedClass inner, OuterClass outer |
outer = enclosingInstanceType(inner) and
typeBeingConstructed = inner and
// where the inner is called from the outer class
classInstanceEnclosing.getDeclaringType() = outer
)
or
// and inner is called from the a parallel inner
exists(NestedClass inner, OuterClass outer, NestedClass otherinner |
typeBeingConstructed = inner and
outer = enclosingInstanceType(otherinner) and
outer = enclosingInstanceType(inner) and
classInstanceEnclosing.getDeclaringType() = otherinner
)
}

from Annotatable annotated, Annotation annotation, Expr e
where
annotation.getType().hasName("VisibleForTesting") and
annotated.getAnAnnotation() = annotation and
(
// field access
exists(FieldAccess v |
v = e and
v.getField() = annotated and
// depending on the visiblity of the field, using the annotation to abuse the visibility may/may not be occurring
(
// if its package protected report when its used outside its class bc it should have been private (class only permitted)
v.getField().isPackageProtected() and
not isWithinType(v.getEnclosingCallable(), v.getField().getDeclaringType())
or
// if public or protected report when its used outside its package because package protected should have been enough (package only permitted)
(v.getField().isPublic() or v.getField().isProtected()) and
not isWithinPackage(v.getEnclosingCallable(), v.getField().getDeclaringType())
)
)
or
// class instantiation
exists(ClassInstanceExpr c |
c = e and
c.getConstructedType() = annotated and
// depending on the visiblity of the class, using the annotation to abuse the visibility may/may not be occurring
// if public report when its used outside its package because package protected should have been enough (package only permitted)
(
c.getConstructedType().isPublic() and
not isWithinPackage(c.getEnclosingCallable(), c.getConstructedType())
or
// if its package protected report when its used outside its outer class bc it should have been private (outer class only permitted)
c.getConstructedType().hasNoModifier() and
// and the class is an innerclass, because otherwise recommending a lower accessibility makes no sense (only inner classes can be private)
exists(enclosingInstanceType(c.getConstructedType())) and
not isWithinDirectOuterClassOrSiblingInner(c.getEnclosingCallable(), c.getConstructedType())
)
)
or
// method access
exists(MethodCall c |
c = e and
c.getMethod() = annotated and
// depending on the visiblity of the method, using the annotation to abuse the visibility may/may not be occurring
(
// if its package protected report when its used outside its class bc it should have been private (class only permitted)
c.getMethod().isPackageProtected() and
not isWithinType(c.getEnclosingCallable(), c.getMethod().getDeclaringType())
or
// if public or protected report when its used outside its package because package protected should have been enough (package only permitted)
(c.getMethod().isPublic() or c.getMethod().isProtected()) and
not isWithinPackage(c.getEnclosingCallable(), c.getMethod().getDeclaringType())
)
)
) and
// not in a test where use is appropriate
not e.getEnclosingCallable() instanceof LikelyTestMethod and
// also omit our own ql unit test where it is acceptable
not e.getEnclosingCallable()
.getFile()
.getAbsolutePath()
.matches("%java/ql/test/query-tests/%Test.java")
select e, "Access of $@ annotated with VisibleForTesting found in production code.", annotated,
"element"
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
| packageone/SourcePackage.java:8:21:8:32 | Annotated.m1 | Access of $@ annotated with VisibleForTesting found in production code. | packagetwo/Annotated.java:9:29:9:30 | m1 | element |
| packagetwo/Source.java:7:17:7:29 | f(...) | Access of $@ annotated with VisibleForTesting found in production code. | packagetwo/Annotated.java:12:16:12:16 | f | element |
| packagetwo/Source.java:8:20:8:30 | Annotated.m | Access of $@ annotated with VisibleForTesting found in production code. | packagetwo/Annotated.java:7:19:7:19 | m | element |
| packagetwo/Source.java:9:28:9:47 | new AnnotatedClass(...) | Access of $@ annotated with VisibleForTesting found in production code. | packageone/AnnotatedClass.java:4:14:4:27 | AnnotatedClass | element |
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
query: Violations of Best Practice/Implementation Hiding/VisibleForTestingAbuse.ql
postprocess: utils/test/InlineExpectationsTestQuery.ql
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
package packageone;

@VisibleForTesting
public class AnnotatedClass {
public AnnotatedClass() {}
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
package packageone;

import packagetwo.Annotated;

public class SourcePackage extends Annotated {
void f() {
AnnotatedClass a = new AnnotatedClass(); // COMPLIANT - same package
String s1 = Annotated.m1; // $ Alert
}
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
package packageone;

public @interface VisibleForTesting {
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
package packagetwo;

import packageone.*;

public class Annotated {
@VisibleForTesting
static String m;
@VisibleForTesting
static protected String m1;

@VisibleForTesting
static int f() {
return 1;
}
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
package packagetwo;

import packageone.*;

public class Source {
void f() {
int i = Annotated.f(); // $ Alert
String s = Annotated.m; // $ Alert
AnnotatedClass a = new AnnotatedClass(); // $ Alert
String s1 = Annotated.m1; // COMPLIANT - same package
}
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
package packagetwo;

import packageone.*;

public class Test {
void f() {
int i = Annotated.f(); // COMPLIANT
String s = Annotated.m; // COMPLIANT
AnnotatedClass a = new AnnotatedClass(); // COMPLIANT
String s1 = Annotated.m1; // COMPLIANT
}
}