-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Enhances remote provider connection flow #4411
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
sergeibbb
wants to merge
2
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
bug/4387-fix-integration-status
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+14
−9
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It does feel a bit weird that we could call "ConnectRemoteProvider" as a command without a remote supplied, but that's probably just semantics at this point.
LGTM will verify once it's in, thanks for updating it!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@axosoft-ramint
Yes. It's called "connect provider" but connects an integration. The question is what if I have 2 remotes: one for GitHub and another one for Azure and both are disconnected. But at some point on the previous version with
ConnectCloudIntegrationsCommand
it should have been defined somehow too.In
ConnectRemoteProviderCommand
it can be called without a definedremote
and there is a code substitute a value forremote
:With old

ConnectCloudIntegrationsCommand
we already had a provider and took an integration-id from it:But how that provider has been picked? I'm going to check out the origin of the
provider
value there and maybe it will be possible to take a remote for it in that place. Or, maybe theConnectRemoteProviderCommand
could acceptprovider
argument whenremote
is unknown, because havingprovider
is enough for getting its integration.