Install gnopls and set GNOROOT

[harry-hov]

Latest version of vscode-gno uses gnopls to provide diagnostics and some code completion features.

Updated .gitpod.yml to install gnopls

Preview

[netlify]

👷 Deploy request for gnochess pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	24170e1

[netlify]

👷 Deploy request for gnochess-signup-form pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	24170e1

[thehowl]

thanks hariom! I'll take a look after sleeping (in ~9 hrs) first thing :)

[thehowl]

Mhh, I'm having some weird/funky behaviour with this.

Couple things that I notice which I think are bad for UX, just a few minutes of testing:

• We pass on the precompile -> lint? error github.com/gnolang/gno/gnovm/stdlibs/stdshim and similar, this should be filtered out
• I can't get things like the unused variable error that is in your video
• Tried playing out with code, at one point I made a declaration which on save was being changed (x := "xx" -> x := "")

Think we might need for it to be slightly more stable, though I really do appreciate the effort!

[harry-hov]

Mhh, I'm having some weird/funky behaviour with this.

Couple things that I notice which I think are bad for UX, just a few minutes of testing:

• We pass on the precompile -> lint? error github.com/gnolang/gno/gnovm/stdlibs/stdshim and similar, this should be filtered out

Language Server uses gno binary to provide errors (specifically gno precompile and gno build)

If we we want to filter out something maybe need to modify gno build

• I can't get things like the unused variable error that is in your video

That's strange.

Again that error in video was from gno build. Maybe some problem with gno build

• Tried playing out with code, at one point I made a declaration which on save was being changed (x := "xx" -> x := "")

Ah. Seems like there is some delay in language server onChange event.
If you type fast, you might lose few char onSave (due to latency). need to see how i can fix that

Think we might need for it to be slightly more stable, though I really do appreciate the effort!

I agree with you. It was implemented in rush.
Please look at PR #175. We might need to merge that one before workshop?