WIP Implementation of required workflows Actions

[AvengerMoJo]

It is a large PR, would like to add this updated PR to replace #30067 and start creating test cases for it.

[lunny]

It's too flexible to allow the workflows from any repositories. How about only allow workflows from a special repository like <org>/.workflows?

[AvengerMoJo]

It's too flexible to allow the workflows from any repositories. How about only allow workflows from a special repository like <org>/.workflows?

Sure, @lunny thanks for reviewing, let me put that filter logic in. I was trying to implement the basic minimal feature and discuss the implementation details with the actions maintainer so any suggestion is welcome.
Meanwhile, should I keep this WIP branch or I create another branch in my home repo called require_action. https://github.com/AvengerMoJo/gitea/tree/require_action

[lunny]

It's too flexible to allow the workflows from any repositories. How about only allow workflows from a special repository like <org>/.workflows?

Sure, @lunny thanks for reviewing, let me put that filter logic in. I was trying to implement the basic minimal feature and discuss the implementation details with the actions maintainer so any suggestion is welcome. Meanwhile, should I keep this WIP branch or I create another branch in my home repo called require_action. https://github.com/AvengerMoJo/gitea/tree/require_action

Maybe keeping them in the same PR is better? So later reviewers can have context in the same place?

[yp05327]

Typo in title? RequestActions? RequireActions?

[AvengerMoJo]

@lunny adding a filter to make sure only .workflow repo could add as Global Required Workflow actions

[AvengerMoJo]

Typo in title? RequestActions? RequireActions?

@yp05327 fixed, along with the filter for .workflow repo only to enable global required workflow.

[AvengerMoJo]

@lunny any suggestion for my next step to include this in the next feature update?

[dcto]

it's important !!! multiple micro service deploy project.