Skip to content

Conversation

@lunny
Copy link
Member

@lunny lunny commented Mar 1, 2025

This will make a user as reserved or recover easier than before.

@lunny lunny added the type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality label Mar 1, 2025
@lunny lunny added this to the 1.24.0 milestone Mar 1, 2025
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Mar 1, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added modifies/translation modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code modifies/templates This PR modifies the template files labels Mar 1, 2025
@wxiaoguang
Copy link
Contributor

Have you clarified the behaviors for different user types?

For example: user password? user tokens? oauth applications?

@techknowlogick
Copy link
Member

Please add screenshots

Copy link
Contributor

@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need to clarify all details when changing the user type, for example: to a "bot" user: what happens to the user password? user tokens? oauth applications?

Why an "org" user could become an "individual" user?

Totally a mess.

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/blocked A maintainer has reservations with the PR and thus it cannot be merged and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Mar 1, 2025
@lunny
Copy link
Member Author

lunny commented Mar 1, 2025

Need to clarify all details when changing the user type, for example: to a "bot" user: what happens to the user password? user tokens? oauth applications?

Why an "org" user could become an "individual" user?

Totally a mess.

I think you are right. I actually want to mark user as reversed or unreserved in this PR. I will close this one and proposal a new one.

@lunny lunny closed this Mar 1, 2025
@lunny lunny deleted the lunny/allow_admin_change_type branch March 1, 2025 21:00
@lunny lunny removed this from the 1.24.0 milestone Mar 1, 2025
@go-gitea go-gitea locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 31, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

lgtm/blocked A maintainer has reservations with the PR and thus it cannot be merged modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code modifies/templates This PR modifies the template files modifies/translation type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants