Skip to content

Conversation

@danielchin
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #989

Formalizes Erdos Problem 865: https://www.erdosproblems.com/865

Assisted by Gemini/Antigravity

@github-actions github-actions bot added the erdos-problems Erdős Problems label Feb 7, 2026
Copy link
Collaborator

@mo271 mo271 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, lgtm, only minor nits

-/
@[category research open, AMS 5 11]
theorem erdos_865 :
answer(sorry) ↔ ∃ C > 0, ∀ᶠ (N : ℕ) in atTop,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
answer(sorry) ↔ ∃ C > 0, ∀ᶠ (N : ℕ) in atTop,
∃ C > 0, ∀ᶠ (N : ℕ) in atTop,

This is one case I would leave out the anser(sorry) because it is not phrased as a question.

@[category research open, AMS 5 11]
theorem erdos_865.variants.sos :
∀ᵉ (k : ℕ) (hk : 2 ≤ k),
∃ c, c = (1 / 2 : ℝ) * (1 + ∑ r ∈ Icc 1 (k - 2), (1 / 4 : ℝ) ^ r) ∧
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
∃ c, c = (1 / 2 : ℝ) * (1 + ∑ r ∈ Icc 1 (k - 2), (1 / 4 : ℝ) ^ r)
letI c := (1 / 2 : ℝ) * (1 + ∑ r ∈ Icc 1 (k - 2), (1 / 4 : ℝ) ^ r)

I would either just inline this or if you really want to name the constanst, use letI.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

erdos-problems Erdős Problems

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Erdős Problem 865

2 participants