feat: add engineering standards skill#14
feat: add engineering standards skill#14MohammedSaudAlsahli wants to merge 1 commit intogoogle-gemini:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information. For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request. |
Summary of ChangesHello @MohammedSaudAlsahli, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a new Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new skill file for engineering standards. The document is comprehensive and well-structured, covering a wide array of essential topics from core principles to language-specific best practices and DevOps. I have one suggestion to enhance the clarity of the Angular code example to prevent any potential confusion for developers.
| <button (click)="updateRole()">Promote</button> | ||
| </div> | ||
| `, | ||
| changeDetection: ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush | ||
| }) | ||
| export class UserProfileComponent { | ||
| private authService = inject(AuthService); | ||
| userId = signal<string>('123'); | ||
| userName = computed(() => `User: ${this.userId()}`); | ||
| isAdmin = this.authService.isAdmin; // Signal from service | ||
|
|
||
| updateRole() { | ||
| this.userId.set('456'); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The Angular signal component pattern example is a bit confusing. The button text is 'Promote' and the handler is updateRole, but the implementation this.userId.set('456') changes the user ID, not the role. This can be misleading for developers trying to follow this pattern.
To make the example clearer and more consistent, the method name and button text should match the action.
| <button (click)="updateRole()">Promote</button> | |
| </div> | |
| `, | |
| changeDetection: ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush | |
| }) | |
| export class UserProfileComponent { | |
| private authService = inject(AuthService); | |
| userId = signal<string>('123'); | |
| userName = computed(() => `User: ${this.userId()}`); | |
| isAdmin = this.authService.isAdmin; // Signal from service | |
| updateRole() { | |
| this.userId.set('456'); | |
| } | |
| <button (click)="changeUser()">Change User</button> | |
| </div> | |
| `, | |
| changeDetection: ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush | |
| }) | |
| export class UserProfileComponent { | |
| private authService = inject(AuthService); | |
| userId = signal<string>('123'); | |
| userName = computed(() => `User: ${this.userId()}`); | |
| isAdmin = this.authService.isAdmin; // Signal from service | |
| changeUser() { | |
| this.userId.set('456'); | |
| } |
No description provided.