Skip to content

Conversation

@happyhuman
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@happyhuman happyhuman self-assigned this Dec 9, 2025
@happyhuman happyhuman requested a review from tpryan December 9, 2025 00:20
@happyhuman happyhuman requested review from tommywagz and removed request for tpryan January 7, 2026 20:11
@tommywagz tommywagz force-pushed the format/python/product-catalog-ad-generation branch from af0046b to 20de151 Compare January 12, 2026 23:05
Copy link
Collaborator

@tommywagz tommywagz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally LGTM, assuming the reference table with the BQ table was commented to prevent blocking errors

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just curious, why is the table reference commented out? Looks good though

@tommywagz
Copy link
Collaborator

Even with the git head set to (20de151) there are still conflicts to resolve with main. I'll resolve the conflicts and request your review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants