fix: Escape "Google" as a keyword

[robertvoinescu-work]

Treat google as a keyword in terms of escaping.

Validation

• The generated Google.Apis.Aiplatform.v1 client successfully executed a ListModels API call against
  projects/robertvoinescu-testing/locations/global.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @robertvoinescu-work, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the code generation process by explicitly reserving the terms "Google" and "google" as special identifiers. This ensures that the generated client libraries correctly handle these names, particularly in the context of top-level namespaces, thereby improving the robustness and correctness of the generated code.

Highlights

• Keyword Definition: The terms "Google" and "google" have been added to the internal list of keywords within the code generator. Although not true C# keywords, they are now treated as such for escaping purposes, particularly when used as top-level namespace identifiers.
• Code Generation Impact: This change ensures that generated code will properly escape these terms if they conflict with identifiers, preventing potential naming collisions or compilation issues in client libraries.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request correctly adds 'Google' and 'google' to the list of reserved keywords to ensure they are properly escaped, as they are used for the top-level namespace. The change is straightforward and effective. I have one suggestion to improve the clarity and consistency of the comments associated with these new keywords.

[amanda-tarafa]

Converted to draft until chekcs are green, etc.

[robertvoinescu-work]

I believe the original intention here was to check if a keyword exists ignoring case, this was done using ToLowerInvariant(). This worked since the keywords where all lower case, this is no longer the case. So we just ignore case now.

[amanda-tarafa]

I think I'd prefer if we leave things as they were and we add a separate collection and method for case sensitive "reserved names", something like Keywords.IsReservedName(string name).

Look for instance at method Keywords.PrependAtIfKeyword, which may now result in some appearances of "Google" being turned into "@google".

[robertvoinescu-work]

Done and verified the current changes are all that is needed to resolve the issue:

[amanda-tarafa]

I think I'd prefer if we leave things as they were and we add a separate collection and method for case sensitive "reserved names", something like Keywords.IsReservedName(string name).

Look for instance at method Keywords.PrependAtIfKeyword, which may now result in some appearances of "Google" being turned into "@google".

[amanda-tarafa]

One tiny request, but LGTM.