chore(looker): make looker integration tests less error prone#2730
chore(looker): make looker integration tests less error prone#2730drstrangelooker wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the robustness of Looker integration tests by introducing unique identifiers for test-created resources. By appending a random string to object names, the tests can run more reliably without interference from previously created or concurrently existing resources, thereby reducing flakiness and improving test stability. Additionally, several Go module dependencies were updated to ensure the project uses the latest stable versions. Highlights
Changelog
Ignored Files
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request aims to make the Looker integration tests more robust by using a random string to name test resources, preventing collisions. While the overall approach is sound, there is a critical issue in the implementation. The code attempts to use a non-existent function rand.Text() from the crypto/rand package, which will cause a compilation failure. I've provided a code suggestion to fix this by correctly generating a random hexadecimal string.
458b5a2 to
17ea048
Compare
Description
make looker integration tests less error prone by adding a random 8 char string to the names of objects created and deleted.
PR Checklist
CONTRIBUTING.md
bug/issue
before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate
designs, and agree on the general idea
!if this involve a breaking change🛠️ Fixes #