Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 26, 2026. It is now read-only.

chore: running integration test with Protobuf 4.31.0 [no need to review]#2033

Closed
lqiu96 wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
protobuf-4.30.1-RC1
Closed

chore: running integration test with Protobuf 4.31.0 [no need to review]#2033
lqiu96 wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
protobuf-4.30.1-RC1

Conversation

@lqiu96
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@lqiu96 lqiu96 commented Apr 30, 2025

No description provided.

@lqiu96 lqiu96 added the kokoro:run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Apr 30, 2025
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: xs Pull request size is extra small. api: spanner Issues related to the googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc API. labels Apr 30, 2025
@lqiu96 lqiu96 changed the title chore: Test with Protobuf-Java v4.29.4 chore: running integration test with Protobuf 4.31.0-RC1 [no need to review] Apr 30, 2025
@yoshi-kokoro yoshi-kokoro removed the kokoro:run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Apr 30, 2025
@ldetmer ldetmer force-pushed the protobuf-4.30.1-RC1 branch from f3cacc0 to 9f1645e Compare May 22, 2025 16:46
@ldetmer ldetmer added the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label May 22, 2025
@yoshi-kokoro yoshi-kokoro removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label May 22, 2025
@lqiu96 lqiu96 force-pushed the protobuf-4.30.1-RC1 branch from 9f1645e to aecbe96 Compare May 27, 2025 14:20
@lqiu96 lqiu96 changed the title chore: running integration test with Protobuf 4.31.0-RC1 [no need to review] chore: running integration test with Protobuf 4.31.0 [no need to review] May 27, 2025
@lqiu96 lqiu96 closed this Aug 26, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

api: spanner Issues related to the googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc API. size: xs Pull request size is extra small.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants