Skip to content

Conversation

@gounthar
Copy link
Owner

@gounthar gounthar commented Jan 15, 2025

This pull request updates the Jenkins plugins listed in plugins.txt.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated plugin versions for various Jenkins-related components:
      • Branch API
      • GitHub Branch Source
      • Pipeline Graph View
      • Pipeline Groovy Library
      • Workflow API
      • Workflow Durable Task Step
      • Workflow Job
      • Workflow Support

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on updating the versions of multiple Jenkins plugins in the dockerfiles/plugins.txt file. The changes involve incrementing version numbers for several key plugins, including branch-related, pipeline, and workflow plugins. These updates likely represent minor version upgrades to ensure compatibility and potentially include bug fixes or small improvements.

Changes

File Changes
dockerfiles/plugins.txt Updated versions for multiple Jenkins plugins:
- branch-api: 2.12062.1208
- github-branch-source: 18071809
- pipeline-graph-view: 382401
- pipeline-groovy-lib: 745749
- workflow-api: 13361358
- workflow-durable-task-step: 13981400
- workflow-job: 14761496
- workflow-support: 936943

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 Plugins dancing, versions light,
Upgrading Jenkins with all my might!
Numbers climbing, one by one,
A rabbit's update has just begun!
Hop, hop, hooray for code so bright! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the repo label Jan 15, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
dockerfiles/plugins.txt (1)

6-6: Test these plugin updates in a staging environment first.

Given the number of plugin updates and some significant version jumps, it's recommended to:

  1. Test these updates in a staging Jenkins environment first
  2. Verify that all your existing pipelines and jobs continue to work as expected
  3. Have a rollback plan ready in case of any issues

Also applies to: 23-23, 47-48, 73-73, 76-77, 81-81

🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)

6-6: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bf13933 and f4bd0c5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • dockerfiles/plugins.txt (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
dockerfiles/plugins.txt

6-6: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


73-73: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Security Scan
🔇 Additional comments (4)
dockerfiles/plugins.txt (4)

23-23: Verify GitHub integration functionality.

The github-branch-source plugin update (1807 → 1809) is a minor version bump. Since this plugin is crucial for GitHub integration, please ensure it maintains compatibility with your GitHub configuration and workflows.

Let's check for any breaking changes or security advisories:

✅ Verification successful

GitHub Branch Source plugin update is safe to proceed

The version update from 1807 to 1809 is safe to proceed. No security vulnerabilities affect this version, and all known security issues were patched in much older releases.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: MAVEN, package: "org.jenkins-ci.plugins:github-branch-source") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 1181


6-6: Verify plugin compatibility and security advisories for branch-api update.

The version update from 2.1206 to 2.1208 appears to be a minor version bump.

Let's verify the plugin compatibility and check for any security advisories:

✅ Verification successful

Branch API plugin update appears safe and compatible

The update from 2.1206 to 2.1208 is a minor version bump with:

  • No known security vulnerabilities
  • All required dependencies present in plugins.txt
  • Standard version format following Jenkins plugin versioning scheme
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for security advisories and compatibility issues for branch-api plugin
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: MAVEN, package: "org.jenkins-ci.plugins:branch-api") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 368


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check plugins.txt for context and look for dependency information
echo "=== Current plugins.txt content ==="
cat dockerfiles/plugins.txt

echo -e "\n=== Looking for README or documentation files that might contain compatibility info ==="
fd -t f "README|CHANGELOG" -E "node_modules"

Length of output: 3074

🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)

6-6: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


73-73: Review interdependency between workflow plugin updates.

Multiple workflow-related plugins are being updated:

  • workflow-api: +22 versions
  • workflow-durable-task-step: +2 versions
  • workflow-job: +20 versions
  • workflow-support: +7 versions

These plugins are typically interdependent. Please ensure all dependent plugins are compatible with these new versions.

Let's verify the compatibility between these workflow plugins:

Also applies to: 76-77, 81-81

✅ Verification successful

Workflow plugin updates appear compatible

The coordinated minor version updates across workflow plugins maintain compatibility. No dependency conflicts or security vulnerabilities were detected.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any explicit version dependencies between workflow plugins
rg -A 5 "workflow-(api|durable-task-step|job|support)" | grep -i "depend"

# Check for security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: MAVEN, package: "org.jenkins-ci.plugins.workflow:workflow-api") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 453


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for plugin manifest files
fd -e hpi -e xml | grep -i "workflow\|plugin" | xargs cat 2>/dev/null | grep -i "depend"

# Search for any workflow-related configuration
rg -i "workflow.*version|version.*workflow" --type xml --type json

# Check for any documented plugin requirements
fd "README|CHANGELOG" | xargs cat 2>/dev/null | grep -i "workflow.*plugin"

Length of output: 210

🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)

73-73: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


47-48: Verify compatibility with other Pipeline plugins.

Notable version jumps in Pipeline plugins:

  • pipeline-graph-view: +19 versions
  • pipeline-groovy-lib: +4 versions

Since these are part of the Pipeline suite, please ensure compatibility with other Pipeline plugins in use.

Let's check for any compatibility issues or security advisories:

✅ Verification successful

Pipeline plugin updates verified as compatible

The version updates are safe to proceed:

  • pipeline-graph-view update (401.v99b_6582132f4) contains only improvements and dependency updates
  • pipeline-groovy-lib bump is minor and maintains compatibility
  • All pipeline-model-* plugins are in sync at version 2.2218
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for dependencies on these pipeline plugins
rg -A 5 "pipeline-(graph-view|groovy-lib)" | grep -i "depend"

# Check for security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: MAVEN, package: "org.jenkins-ci.plugins.workflow:pipeline-groovy-lib") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 448


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# List all pipeline-related plugins and their versions
grep -i "pipeline" dockerfiles/plugins.txt

# Check for any potential conflicts or issues in the changelog
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  repository(owner: "jenkinsci", name: "pipeline-graph-view-plugin") {
    releases(first: 5, orderBy: {field: CREATED_AT, direction: DESC}) {
      nodes {
        name
        description
        createdAt
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 5357

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
dockerfiles/plugins.txt (1)

Line range hint 1-83: Overall upgrade assessment and recommendations.

The plugin updates appear well-coordinated, updating related plugins together. However, there are several significant version bumps that warrant careful testing:

  1. Core Pipeline components (pipeline-graph-view: 382 → 401)
  2. GitHub integration (github-branch-source: 1807 → 1809)
  3. Workflow engine (workflow-api: 1336 → 1358, workflow-job: 1476 → 1496)

Recommended upgrade approach:

  1. Create a backup of JENKINS_HOME
  2. Test upgrades in a staging environment
  3. Plan for a maintenance window
  4. Have a rollback plan ready
  5. Monitor system logs after upgrade

Would you like me to help create a detailed testing checklist or rollback procedure?

🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)

70-70: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


73-73: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bf13933 and f4bd0c5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • dockerfiles/plugins.txt (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
dockerfiles/plugins.txt

6-6: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


73-73: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Security Scan
🔇 Additional comments (4)
dockerfiles/plugins.txt (4)

23-23: Verify GitHub integration functionality.

The github-branch-source plugin update (1807 → 1809) might affect GitHub integration. Ensure that:

  1. GitHub server connections remain functional
  2. Branch discovery and scanning work as expected
  3. GitHub webhook triggers continue to work

47-48: Review impact of major Pipeline plugin updates.

The pipeline-graph-view plugin has a significant version bump (382 → 401) which might introduce breaking changes or UI modifications. The pipeline-groovy-lib update is minor but related.

Consider:

  1. Testing pipeline visualization features
  2. Verifying existing pipeline scripts continue to work
  3. Checking for any new UI elements or changes in the Pipeline Graph View

Consider performing a staged rollout if possible, starting with a test Jenkins instance.


73-73: Coordinate testing of workflow plugin updates.

Multiple workflow-related plugins are being updated:

  • workflow-api: significant version bump (1336 → 1358)
  • workflow-job: major version bump (1476 → 1496)
  • workflow-durable-task-step and workflow-support: minor updates

These plugins are tightly coupled and form the core of Jenkins Pipeline functionality.

Recommended testing strategy:

  1. Test on a staging environment first
  2. Verify all pipeline types: Declarative, Scripted, and Multibranch
  3. Check build history preservation
  4. Validate running pipelines complete successfully after upgrade

Also applies to: 76-77, 81-81

🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)

73-73: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


6-6: Verify compatibility with dependent plugins.

The branch-api plugin update (2.1206 → 2.1208) is a minor version bump. Please ensure compatibility with the following dependent plugins that are also being updated:

  • github-branch-source
  • workflow-job
  • workflow-multibranch
✅ Verification successful

Branch API plugin update appears safe

The minor version bump (2.1206 → 2.1208) shows no compatibility issues with dependent plugins. All required dependencies are present in the plugins.txt file with recent versions, and there are no reported compatibility issues in the plugin's repository.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for known compatibility issues with branch-api plugin
# Search for any reported issues related to branch-api 2.1208 compatibility

gh api graphql -f query='
{
  search(query: "repo:jenkinsci/branch-api is:issue state:open label:compatibility", type: ISSUE, first: 5) {
    nodes {
      ... on Issue {
        title
        url
        labels(first: 5) {
          nodes {
            name
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 336


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for plugins depending on branch-api and their versions
rg -l "branch-api" 

# Get all plugin versions from plugins.txt
cat dockerfiles/plugins.txt

Length of output: 2790

🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)

6-6: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

@gounthar gounthar closed this Jan 15, 2025
@gounthar gounthar deleted the update-plugins-2025/01/15/09/22/50 branch January 15, 2025 10:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants