Skip to content

Conversation

joanlopez
Copy link
Contributor

@joanlopez joanlopez commented Jun 21, 2024

What?

It documents the new experimental_enhanced compatibility mode.

Checklist

  • I have used a meaningful title for the PR.
  • I have described the changes I've made in the "What?" section above.
  • I have performed a self-review of my changes.
  • I have run the npm start command locally and verified that the changes look good.
  • I have made my changes in the docs/sources/next folder of the documentation.
  • I have reflected my changes in the docs/sources/v{most_recent_release} folder of the documentation.
  • I have reflected my changes in the relevant folders of the two previous k6 versions of the documentation (if still applicable to previous versions).
  • I have made my changes in the docs/sources/next folder of the documentation.

Related PR(s)/Issue(s)

We might also want to update:

@joanlopez joanlopez added Area: OSS Content Improvements or additions to community/oss documentation type/docs labels Jun 21, 2024
@joanlopez joanlopez requested a review from szkiba June 21, 2024 17:46
@joanlopez joanlopez self-assigned this Jun 21, 2024
@joanlopez
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks so much @heitortsergent! 💟

@joanlopez joanlopez merged commit ce1ceca into main Jun 25, 2024
@joanlopez joanlopez deleted the experimental_enhanced branch June 25, 2024 06:12
schalksnyman pushed a commit to schalksnyman/k6-docs that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2025
* Document 'experimental_enhanced' compatibility mode

* Replace script.js with script.ts

* Add alias

* Remove property to hide page from menu

* Rename page and update page title

* Add links to esbuild

* Update mentions of TypeScript to link to compatibility mode

---------

Co-authored-by: Heitor Tashiro Sergent <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: OSS Content Improvements or additions to community/oss documentation type/docs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants